Long-term results for aortic valve replacement with small aortic annulus

Artificial Organs

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 474-478

  Yamasaki, Motoshige ^a   Sasaguri, Shiro ^b   Hosoda, Yasuyuki ^a   Takazawa, Kenji ^a   Yamamoto, Taira ^a   Hariya, Akifusa ^a  

^a JUNTENDO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b Kochi Medical University   (Japan)

Author keywords

Aortic valve replacement; Left ventricular mass; Small aortic annulus

Indexed keywords

ORIFICES; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PROSTHETICS;

AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT; AORTIC VALVES; AREA INDEX; CONTROL GROUPS; HAEMODYNAMICS; LEFT VENTRICULAR MASS; LONG-TERM RESULTS; ORIFICE AREA; SMALL AORTIC ANNULUS; VALVE REPLACEMENT;

BLOOD VESSELS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; BJOERK SHILEY VALVE PROSTHESIS; BODY SURFACE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE HYPERTROPHY; HEART WEIGHT; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REVIEW; SAINT JUDE HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR RING;

EID: 0036093678     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2002.06977.x     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Influence of the size of aortic valve prostheses on hemodynamics and changes in left ventricular mass: Implication for surgical management of aortic stenosis
2. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement
3. Aortic valve replacement: Is valve size important?
4. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: Comparison to necropsy findings
5. Effect of prosthetic of valve design on the Doppler-catheter gradient correlation: An in-vitro study of normal St Jude, Medtronic-Hall, Star-Edwards and Hancock valves
6. The natural history of adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis
7. Standard versus hemodynamic plus 19-mm St Jude Medical aortic valves
8. Nineteen-millimeter aortic St. Jude Medical heart valve prosthesis: Up to sixteen years' follow-up
9. Influence of aortic valve replacement, prosthesis type, and size on functional outcome and ventricular mass in patients with aortic stenosis