SCOPUS 정보 검색 플랫폼

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 198-201

A defence of the potential future of value theory

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABORTION; ARTICLE; CHILD DEATH; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; LIFESPAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MORALITY; WELFARE;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;

ABORTION, LEGAL; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; FEMALE; FETUS; HOMICIDE; HUMANS; MORALS; PREGNANCY; VALUE OF LIFE;

EID: 0036076688 PISSN: 03066800 EISSN: None Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1136/jme.28.3.198 Document Type: Article

Times cited : (16)

References (21)

1
- 0024644342
- Why abortion is immoral
- See the second paragraph for the statement of the assumption
- (1989) The Journal of Philosophy , vol.86 , pp. 183-202
- Marquis, D.¹

2
- 0034128309
- The morality of abortion and the deprivation of futures
- (2000) Journal of Medical Ethics , vol.26 , pp. 103-107
- Brown, M.¹

4
- 0035666117
- Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing
- (2001) Journal of Medical Ethics , vol.27 , pp. 363-369
- Marquis, D.¹

5
- 0036076420
- A future like ours revisited
- Compare 192-5 at p. where he baldly asserts the opposite
- (2002) Journal of Medical Ethics , vol.28 , pp. 192
- Brown, M.¹

6
- 0035666117
- Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing
- (2001) Journal of Medical Ethics , vol.27 , pp. 363-369
- Marquis, D.¹

9
- 0005813706
- This seems a reasonable interpretation of Brown's views at reference
- , vol.4 , pp. 194-195

12
- 0003560902
- For example, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- (1979) Practical Ethics , pp. 82-83
- Singer, P.¹

13
- 0005852465
- Abortion and the way we value human life
- Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield
- (1999)
- Reiman, J.¹

14
- 84910472031
- Abortion and infanticide
- Tooley's view is the most famous view of this kind
- (1972) Philosophy and Public Affairs , vol.2 , pp. 37-65
- Tooley, M.¹

16
- 0036076421
- Present self-represented futures of value are a reason for the wrongness of killing
- (2002) Journal of Medical Ethics , vol.28 , pp. 196-197
- Parsons, S.¹

17
- 0005805394
- This famous argument is due to Epicurus. Letter to Menoeceus
- Saunders JL, ed. New York: The Free Press
- (1966) Greek and Roman philosophy after Aristotle , pp. 49-52

18
- 4243527848
- Far more extensive discussions of this issue can be found in Nagel T
- Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ch 1, Death, and in Feldman F. Confrontations with the reaper: A philosophical study of the nature and value of death. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992: chs 8 and 9
- (1979) Mortal questions

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.