Assessing game theory, role playing, and unaided judgement

International Journal of Forecasting

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 345-352

  Armstrong, J Scott ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Forecasting; Role playing; Simulated interactions

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036074310     PISSN: 01692070     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2070(02)00024-9     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Barriers to scientific contributions: The author's formula
2. Why can't a game be more like a business? A review of Co-opetition by Brandenburger and Nalebuff
3. Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation
4. Role playing: A method to forecast decisions
5. Combining forecasts
6. Evaluating methods
7. Predicting the outcome of marketing negotiations
8. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
9. Combining the judgments of experts: How many and which ones?
10. Co-opetition
11. Forecasting games: Can game theory win?
12. Forecasting decisions in conflict situations: A comparison of game theory, role playing and unaided judgment
13. A note on aggregating opinions
14. Performance of a composite as a function of the number of judges
15. The impact of incentives on the accuracy of subjects in judgmental forecasting experiments
16. The cooperative subject: Myth or reality