Getting to the bottom line: A method for synthesizing findings within mixed-method program evaluations

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 121-140

  McConney, Andrew ^a   Rudd, Andy ^a   Ayres, Robert ^a  

^a FLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036069727     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1098-2140(02)00164-9     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Data analysis strategies for mixed-method evaluation designs
2. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
3. The logic of naturalistic inquiry
4. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research
5. Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed-method evaluation
6. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs
7. A practical guide to modern methods of meta-analysis
8. Correcting for sources of artificial variation across studies
9. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action
10. Qualitative and quantitative methods: When stories converge
11. The concept of meta-analysis
12. Research methods in education and psychology
13. Mixed-method collaboration. Mixed-method evaluation: Developing quality criteria through concept mapping
14. How to use qualitative methods in evaluation
15. Numbers and words: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study
16. An introduction to meta-evaluation
17. Evaluating educational programs
18. The logic and methodology of checklists
19. Improving inferences from multiple methods
20. Meta-evaluation
21. Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches
22. On the reconciliation of qualitative and quantitative analyses: A case study
23. Mixed-method evaluation: A case study