Calibration of pesticide leaching models: Critical review and guidance for reporting

Pest Management Science

Volumn 58, Issue 8, 2002, Pages 745-758

  Dubus, Igor G ^a   Beulke, Sabine ^a   Brown, Colin D ^a  

^a CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Extrapolation; Guidelines; Inverse modelling; Pesticide leaching; Validation

Indexed keywords

PESTICIDE;

CALIBRATION; LEACHING; MODEL VALIDATION; PESTICIDE;

AUTOMATION; CALIBRATION; CROP; CROP PROTECTION; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; EVALUATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEACHING; MODEL; PARAMETER; POLLUTANT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; STANDARD; THEORETICAL MODEL;

CALIBRATION; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; GUIDELINES; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PESTICIDES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0036065517     PISSN: 1526498X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ps.526     Document Type: Review

References (94)

1. Use of computer models to assess exposure to agricultural chemical via drinking water
2. Calibration of process-oriented models
3. A European test of pesticide leaching models: Methodology and major recommendations
4. Ring test with the models LEACHP, PRZM-2 and VARLEACH: Variability between model users in prediction of pesticide leaching using a standard data set
5. Towards the development of good modelling practices in chemical fate modeling
6. Recommendations for conducting simulation calculations for the registration procedure
7. Model predictions and field measurements of chlorsulfuron leaching under non-steady-state flow conditions
8. Critical evaluation of models and their parameters
9. Calibrating the root zone water quality model
10. Evaluation and comparison of pesticide leaching models for registration purposes
11. Evaluation of uncalibrated preferential flow models against data for isoproturon movement to drains through a heavy clay soil
12. Evaluation of five simulation models for predicting aldicarb and bromide behavior under field conditions
13. Validation of the pesticide leaching model PELMO using lysimeter studies performed for registration
14. Evaluation and improvement of mathematical models of pesticide mobility in soils and assessment of their potential to predict contamination of water systems
15. Development and validation of a modified fugacity model of pesticide leaching from farmland
16. The validation of pesticide leaching models
17. A simulation model for predicting pesticide concentrations in paddy water and surface soil. II. Model validation and application
18. Groundwater models cannot be validated
19. Verification, validation and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences
20. MACRO: A preferential flow model to simulate pesticide leaching and movement to drains
21. Evaluation of a stepwise procedure for comparative validation of pesticide leaching models
22. Simulation of organic chemical movement in Hawaii soils with PRZM: 3. Calibration
23. Incorporating preferential flow and herbicide fate and transport into the DRAINAGE model
24. Testing and validating environmental models
25. Non-ideal transport of reactive solutes in heterogeneous porous media: 3. Model testing and data analysis using calibration versus prediction
26. Using preferential flow models for management purposes
27. Application of pesticide leaching models to the Vredepeel dataset. II. Pesticide fate
28. Application of pesticide simulation models to the Vredepeel dataset. I. Water, solute and heat transport
29. A method for the assessment of groundwater contamination potential using a Pesticide Root Zone Model (PRZM) for the unsaturated zone
30. Estimation of the potential for atrazine transport in a silt loam soil
31. Progress in simulating macropore flow through soil
32. Comparing and evaluating pesticide leaching models: Results for the Tor Mancina dataset (Italy)
33. Chemical leaching near the Waiawa shaft, Oahu, Hawaii. 2. Modelling results
34. Calibration and validation of runoff and leaching models for turf pesticides and comparison with monitoring results
35. The use of pesticide leaching models in a regulatory setting: An industrial perspective
36. Simulation of pesticide persistence in the field on the basis of laboratory data - A review
37. Estimation of pesticide parameters from lysimeter studies using an inverse modelling approach
38. Estimation of pesticide parameters from static and dynamic experiments by two independent modelling groups
39. A sequential uncertainty domain inverse procedure for estimating subsurface flow and transport parameters
40. Inverse models: A necessary next step in groundwater modeling
41. Validity of agroecosystem models - A comparison of results of different models applied to the same data set
42. Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: Sensitivity to calibration data
43. Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady state conditions. 2. Uniqueness, stability and solution algorithms
44. A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media
45. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils
46. Review of inverse estimation of soil hydraulic properties
47. Using field data and simulation modelling to determine nitrogen cycle parameters
48. Selection criteria of xenobiotic leaching models in soil
49. Pesticide leaching models - Past, present and future
50. Evaluation and comparison of pesticide leaching models for registration purposes. Results of simulations performed with the pesticide leaching model
51. Assessing the groundwater contamination potential of agricultural chemicals: A flexible approach to mobility and degradation studies
52. Modeling the probabilities of groundwater contamination of pesticides
53. Sources of uncertainty in pesticide fate modelling
54. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal
55. Sensitivity and first-step uncertainty analyses for the preferential flow model MACRO
56. The role of sensitivity analysis in groundwater risk modelling for pesticides
57. Evaluation of PRZM and LEACHMP on intact soil columns
58. Sensitivity analysis of a mathematical model for pesticide leaching to groundwater
59. Modeling the influence of the sorption and transformation on pesticide leaching and persistence
60. The site and condition specific nature of sensitivity analysis
61. Comparing and evaluating pesticide leaching models - Results of simulations with PELMO
62. Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: Overview and application
63. Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives
64. Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models
65. Evaluation of pesticide dynamics of the WAVE model
66. Pesticide leaching models and their use for management purposes
67. Review of soil solution samplers
68. The extraction of soil water by the suction-cup method: A review
69. Evaluation of the GLEAMS model for pesticide leaching in Sweden
70. Development and evaluation of a macropore flow component for LEACHM
71. Requirements for effective modelling strategies
72. Comparison of pesticide leaching models: Results using the Weiherbach dataset
73. Sources of error in model predictions of pesticide leaching: A case study using the MACRO model
74. Large simulation models: Calibration, uniqueness and goodness of fit
75. Importance of the convergence criterion in the automatic calibration of hydrological models
76. Parameter estimation of hydraulic properties from one-step outflow data
77. Parameter estimation analysis of the evaporation method for determining soil hydraulic properties
78. The future of distributed models-model calibration and uncertainty prediction
79. Modeller subjectivity in estimating pesticide parameters for leaching models using the same laboratory dataset
80. The Pesticide Root Zone Model (PRZM): A procedure for evaluating pesticide leaching threats to groundwater
81. Assessing the groundwater contamination potential of agricultural chemicals: A flexible approach to mobility and degradation studies
82. Field investigations and modeling of particle-facilitated pesticide transport in macroporous soil
83. Assessing herbicide movement using soil samples versus percolate samples