메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 215-218

The role of the church in developing the law

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; COURT; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LAW SUIT; LEGAL ASPECT; MORALITY; POLICY; RELIGION; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0036060577     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.28.4.215     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (15)

References (35)
  • 2
    • 0005578412 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See reference 1: 174
  • 3
    • 0005601490 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See reference 1: 217
  • 4
    • 0005600284 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See reference 1: 28-9
  • 5
    • 0005527837 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See reference 1: 226
  • 6
    • 0005523329 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See reference 1: 227
  • 7
    • 0005528193 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Re A (children) (conjoined twins: surgical separation) 2 WLR 480; [2000] 3 FCR 577 (CA (Civ Div) 22 Sept 2000)
    • (2001)
  • 8
    • 0005528012 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See reference 7: 488
  • 9
    • 0005621462 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See reference 7: 590
  • 10
    • 0005591831 scopus 로고
    • AC 789 (HL)
    • (1993)
  • 11
    • 0005521038 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See reference 7: 519
  • 12
    • 0005521222 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See reference 7: 537
  • 13
    • 0005564448 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Pro-Life Alliance v Secretary of Health (High Court 26 Jan application for judicial review, Sullivan J)
    • (2001)
  • 14
    • 0005580713 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The appeal was first heard on 15 April 1996: Superclinics Australia Pty Ltd v CES & Ors S141/1995. The Australian Episcopal Conference and the Australian Catholic Health Care Association sought leave to appear as September Ultimately, the appeal did not proceed
    • (1996)
  • 15
    • 77951755517 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Australian Catholic Health Care Association and the Australian Catholic Bishops Conference were only two of the parties to be granted amicus status. The Abortion Providers' Federation was also granted leave curiae and the Women's Electoral Lobby gave informal notice of a similar application but did not proceed with it. Hon Justice Susan Kenny. Interveners and amici curiae in the High Court. at 164
    • (1998) Adelaide Law Review , vol.20 , pp. 159-171
  • 16
    • 0002267180 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Abortion before the High Court: What next? Caveat interventus: A note on Superclinics Australia Pty Ltd v CES
    • (1998) Adelaide Law Review , vol.20 , pp. 183-192
    • Warwick, N.1
  • 17
    • 0005621463 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Voices in the ART access debate
    • [2000] FCA 1009 (28 July 2000). Discussed by Skene L
    • (2001) Monash Bioethics Review , vol.20 , pp. 9-23
  • 18
    • 0000175277 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 1950s family values v human rights: In vitro fertilisation, donor insemination and sexuality in Victoria
    • (2000) Public Law Review , vol.11 , pp. 292-307
    • Walker, K.1
  • 19
    • 0005521039 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Re The Honourable Justice Sundberg; Ex parte Australian Catholic Bishops Conference & Anor (C21/)
    • (2000)
  • 20
    • 0005601491 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Queen on the application of Bruno Quintavalle on behalf of Pro-Life Alliance v Secretary of State for Health. High Court Co/4095/2000, QBD, Admin ct, 15 Nov (Crane J)
    • (2001)
  • 21
    • 0005615321 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Even if the amicus is required to pay costs, those will be only "party-party" costs; the "solicitor-client" costs to be paid by the parties will be higher and even a winning party must pay the difference costs
  • 23
    • 0005520496 scopus 로고
    • The Commonwealth of Australia & Anor v State of Tasmania & Ors 158 CLR 1
    • (1983)
  • 24
    • 0005600285 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Intervention in High Court litigation: A comment
    • (1993) 46 FCR 310. Discussed by Durbach A. She describes "PIAC's history as a public interest amicus curiae" as "brief and chequered": 177
    • (1998) Adelaide Law Review , vol.20 , pp. 177-182
  • 25
    • 0005564660 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 39 NSWLR 377. Also see reference 22: Durbach
    • (1996)
  • 26
    • 0005615322 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 153 ALR 490
    • (1998)
  • 27
    • 0005564449 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Interveners and amici curiae in the High Court: A comment
    • For example, former Chief Justice, Mason Sir A. (1998) 20
    • (1998) Adelaide Law Review , vol.20 , pp. 173-176
  • 28
    • 0005520497 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See reference 25: 174
  • 29
    • 0005521040 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bropho v Tickner 40 Fed Ct Reports 165 at 172 (Wilcox J)
  • 30
    • 0005558495 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • National Australia Bank v Hokit 39 NSWLR 277 at 381 (Mahony J); Levy v Victoria (1997) 189 CLR 579 at 604-5 (Brennan CJ)
    • (1996)
  • 31
    • 0005621464 scopus 로고
    • The amicus curiae brief: Access to the courts for public interest associations 14
    • 1984 at 522. Ms Re gives examples of amicus curiae intervention in the US
    • (1984) Melbourne University Law Review , vol.14 , pp. 522-533
    • Re, L.1
  • 32
  • 33
    • 0004053536 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The trouble with principle
    • Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press
    • (2000)
    • Fish, S.1
  • 34
    • 0005600286 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • "[That] is to say they neither asserted there is no inconsistency nor conceded an inconsistency"
    • McBain v State of Victoria FCA 1009 (28 July 2000). para 3
    • (2000)
  • 35
    • 0005520704 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Similarly, in the appeal, Re The Honourable Justice Sundberg; Ex parte Australian Catholic Bishops Conference & Anor (C21/), the church's arguments are that the Commonwealth does not have power to legislate the Sex Discrimination Act; that Sundberg J erred in not considering the "best interests" of the unborn child, and that his interpretation of the Sex Discrimination Act was inconsistent with the constitutional power enacted, etc. These are all legal arguments
    • (2000)


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.