Effects of four prophylaxis pastes on surface roughness of a composite, a hybrid ionomer, and a compomer restorative material

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 245-251

  Warren, Donna P ^a   Colescott, Tara Debner ^a   Henson, Harold A ^a   Powers, John M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; COMPOMER; DYRACT; FUJI II LC CEMENT; GLASS IONOMER; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PERLITE; PUMICE; RESIN; SILICATE; SILICON DIOXIDE; TPH HYBRID;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL PROPHYLAXIS; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; METHACRYLATES; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; SILICATES; SILICON DIOXIDE; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0036053896     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2002.tb00170.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Zuniga MA, Caldwell RC. The effect of fluoride-containing prophylaxis pastes on normal and "white-spot" enamel. J Dent Child 1969; 6:55-59.
2. Stookey GK. In vitro estimates of enamel and dentin abrasion associated with a prophylaxis. J Dent Res 1978; 57:26-36.
3. Stookey GK, Schemehorn BR. A method for assessing the relative abrasion of prophylaxis materials. J Dent Res 1979; 58:588-592.
4. Koch G, Petersson LB, Johnson G. Abrasion and fluoride-uptake when polishing enamel. Swed Dent J 1975; 68:1-7.
5. Vrbic V, Brudevold F, McCann HG. Acquisition of fluoride by enamel from fluoride pumice pastes. Helv Odont Acta 1967; 11:21-26.
6. Christensen RP, Bangerter VW. Determination of rpm, time, and load used in oral prophylaxis polishing in vivo. J Dent Res 1984; 63:1376-1382.
7. Christensen RP, Bangerter VW. Immediate and long-term in vivo effects of polishing on enamel and dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 57:150-160.
8. Putt MS, Kleber CJ, Muhler JC. Enamel polish and abrasion by prophylaxis pastes. J Dent Hyg 1982; 56:38-43.
9. Biller IR, Hunter EL, Featherstone MJ. Enamel loss during a prophylaxis polish in vitro. J Int Assoc Dent Child 1980; 11:7-12.
10. Hosoya Y, Johnson JW. Evaluation of various cleaning and polishing methods on primary enamel. J Pedod 1989; 13:253-269.
11. Joniot SB, Gregoire GL, Auther AM, Roques YM. Three-dimensional optical profilometry analysis of surface states obtained after finishing sequences for three composite resins. Oper Dent 2000; 25:311-315.
12. Roeder LB, Tate WH, Powers JM. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites. Oper Dent 2000; 25:534-543.
13. Wilder AD Jr., Swift EJ Jr., May KN Jr., Thompson JY, McDougal RA. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. J Dent 2000; 28:367-373.
14. Setcos JC, Tarim B, Suzuki S. Surface finish produced on resin composites by new polishing systems. Quintessence Int 1999; 30:169-173.
15. Jefferies SR. The art and science of abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1998; 42:613-627.
16. Hondrum SO, Fernandez R Jr. Contouring, finishing, and polishing Class 5 restorative materials. Oper Dent 1997; 22:30-36.
17. St Germain HA Jr., Meiers JC. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing. Oper Dent 1996; 21:103-109.
18. Yap AU, Sau CW, Lye KW. Effects of finishing/polishing time on surface characteristics of tooth-coloured restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25:456-461.
19. Lutz F, Sener B, Imfeld T, Barbakow F, Schupbach P. Comparison of the efficacy of prophylaxis pastes with conventional abrasives or a new self-adjusting abrasive. Quintessence Int 1993; 24:193-201.
20. Lutz F, Sener B, Imfeld T, Barbakow F, Schupbach P. Self-adjusting abrasives: a new technology for prophylaxis pastes. Quintessence Int 1993; 24:53-61.
21. Tilliss TS, Hicks MJ. Enamel surface morphology comparison. Polishing with a toothpaste and a prophylaxis paste. J Dent Hyg 1987; 61:112-115.
22. Serio FG, Strassler HE, Litkowski LJ, Moffitt WC, Krupa CM. The effect of polishing pastes on composite resin surfaces. A SEM study. J Periodontol 1988; 59:837-840.
23. Sotres LS, Van Hurpen G, Gilmore HW. A histological study of gingival response to amalgam, silicate, and resin restoratives. J Periodontol 1969; 40:543-546.
24. Waerhaug J. Effect of rough surfaces upon gingival tissues. J Dent Res 1956; 35:323-328.
25. Weitman RT, Eames WB. Plaque accumulation on composite surfaces after various finishing procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1975; 9:101-106.
26. Van Dijken JW, Stadigh J, Meurmann JH. Appearance of finished and unfinished composite surfaces after toothbrushing. Acta Odontol Scand 1983; 41:377-383.
27. Strassler H, Serio F, Litkowski L, Moffitt W. Effect of toothpastes on polished composite resin surfaces. J Dent Res 1987; 66:838. (Abstr)
28. Patterson CJ, McLundie AC. A comparison of the effects of two different prophylaxis regimens in vitro on some restorative dental materials: a preliminary SEM study. Br Dent J 1984; 157:166-170.
29. Acordia CJ, Gonzalez JP, Vitasek BA. Effects of ultrasonic instrumentation on microleakage in composite restorations with glass ionomer liners. J Oral Rehabil 1992; 19:21-29.
30. Vermilyea SG, Prasanna MK, Agar JR. Effect of ultrasonic cleaning and air polishing on porcelain labial margin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71:447-452.
31. Lee Sy, Lai YL, Morgano SM. Effects of ultrasonic scaling and periodontal curettage on surface roughness of porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73:227-232.
32. Gorfil C, Nordenberg D, Liberman R. The effect of ultrasonic cleaning and air polishing on the marginal integrity of composite resin restorations. An in vitro study. J Clin Periodontol 1989; 16:137-139.
33. Bjornson EJ, Collins DE, Engler WO. Surface alteration of composite resins after curette, ultrasonic, and sonic instrumentation: an in vivo study. J Clin Periodontol 1990; 21:381-389.
34. van Dijken JW, Sjostrom S, Wing K. Development of gingivitis around different types of composite resin. J Clin Periodontol 1987; 14:257-260.
35. van Dijken JW, Sjostrom S, Wing K. The effect of different types of composite resin fillings on marginal gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 1987; 14:185-189.
36. Chen JT, Burch JG, Beck FM, Horton JE. Periodontal attachment loss associated with proximal tooth restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 57:416-120.
37. Chung KH. Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface texture of resin composites. Dent Mater 1994; 10:325-330.
38. Hachiya Y, Iwaku M, Hosoda H, Fusayama T. Relation of finish to discoloration of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52:811-814.
39. Bessing C, Wiktorsson A. Comparison of two different methods of polishing porcelain. Scand J Dent Res 1983; 91:482-487.
40. Strassler HE, Bauman G. Current concepts in polishing composite resins. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1993; 5:12-17.
41. Stoddard JW, Johnson GH. An evaluation of polishing agents for composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65:491-495.