Estimation of dominance components in noninbred populations by using additive animal model residuals

Journal of Applied Genetics

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 471-488

  Chalh, Abdellah ^a   El Gazzah, Mohamed ^a  

^a Lab de Genetique   (Tunisia)

Author keywords

BLUP; EM algorithm; Nonadditive genetic effects; REML method

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DOMINANT GENE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; GENES, DOMINANT; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 0036044233     PISSN: 12341983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. BIJMA P., WOOLLIAMS J.A. (2000). Prediction of rates of inbreeding in populations selected on best linear unbiased prediction of breeding value. Genetics 156: 361-373.
2. CANTET R.J. (1997). Effects of excluding a set of random effects on prediction of error variance of breeding value. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 114: 267-274.
3. CHANG H.A. (1988). Studies on estimation of genetic variances under non-additive gene action. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana, USA.
4. COCKERHAM C.C. (1954). An extension of the concept of partitioning heriditary variance for analysis of covariances among relatives when epistasis is present. Genetics 39: 859-882.
5. DEMPSTER A.P., LAIRD N.M., KUBIN D.B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data with EM algorithm. J. Royal Statistist. Soc. Series B: 39: 1-38.
6. DUANGJINDA M., MISZTAL I., BERTRAND J.K., TSURUTA S. (2001). The empirical bias of estimates by REML, Bayesian method, and method R under selection for additive, maternal, and dominance models. J. Anim. Sci. 79: 2991-2996.
7. FALCONER D.S. (1989). Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Sci. Tech. Publ. London, England.
8. FUERST C., SÖLKNER J. (1994). Additive and nonadditive genetic variances for milk production, fertility, and lifetime performance traits in purebred and crossbred cattle populations. J. Dairy Sci. 77: 1114-1125.
9. GENGLER N., MISZTAL I., BERTRAND J.K., CULBERTSON M.S. (1998). Estimation of the dominance variance for post-weaning gain in US Limousin population. J. Anim. Sci. 76: 2515-2520.
10. GJíEN H.M., GJERDE B. (1998). Comparing breeding schemes using individual phenotypic values and BLUP breeding values as selection criteria. In: Proc. 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Vol. 27, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia: 111-114.
11. GOFFINET B. (1983). Selection on selected records. Genet. Sel. Evol. 15: 91-98.
12. HARTLEY H.O., RAO J.N.K. (1967). Maximum likelihood estimation for mixed analysis of variance model. Biometrika 54: 93-108.
13. HARVILLE D.A. (1977). Maximum likelihood approaches to variance component estimation and to related problems. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 72: 320-338.
14. HENDERSON C.R. (1973). Sire evaluation and genetic trends. In: Proc. of Anim. Breeding and Genet. Symp. in Honor of Dr. J. L. Lush, pp. 10-41. ASAS and ADSA, Champaign, IL.
15. HENDERSON C.R. (1976). A simple method for computing the inverse of a numerator relationship matrix used in prediction of breeding values. Biometrics 32: 69-83.
16. HENDERSON C.R. (1977a). Best linear unbiased prediction of breeding values not in the model for records. J. Dairy Sci. 60: 783-787.
17. HENDERSON C.R. (1977b). Prediction of future records. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Quant. Genetics, Iowa State Univ. Press, Amnes.: 615-638.
18. Henderson C.R. (1985). Best linear unbiased prediction of nonadditive genetic merits in noninbred populations J. Anim. Sci. 60(1): 111-117.
19. HOESCHELE I., VANRADEN P.M. (1991). Rapid inversion of dominance relationship matrices for noninbred populations by including sire-dam subclass effects. J. Dairy Sci. 74: 557-569.
20. KERR R.J. (1998). Asymptotic rates of response from forest tree breeding strategies using best linear unbiased prediction. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96: 484-493.
21. LUSH J.L. (1948). Genetics of populations. Mimeo, Dept. of Anim. Sci., Iowa State Univ., Ames.
22. MIGLIOR F., BURNSIDE E.B. (1995). Inbreeding of Canadian Holstein cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 78: 1163-1167.
23. MIGLIOR F., BURNSIDE E.B., DEKKERS J.C.M. (1995a). Nonadditive genetic effects and inbreeding depression for somatic cell counts of Holstein cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 78: 1168-1173.
24. MIGLIOR F., BURNSIDE E.B., KENNEDY B.W. (1995b). Production traits of Holstein cattle: estimation of nonadditive genetic variance components and inbreeding depression. J. Dairy Sci. 78: 1174-1180.
25. MISZTAL I., FERNANDO R.L., GROSSMAN M., LAWLOR T.J., LUKASZEWICZ M. (1996). Dominance and epistatic effects in genetic evaluation. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 13:251-266.
26. MISZTAL I., LAWLOR T.J., (1996). Estimation of variance components and genetic evaluation with large-scale dominance models. Presented at EAAP meeting, Lillehammer, Norway.
27. MISZTAL I., LAWLOR T.J., FERNANDO R.L. (1997). Studies on dominance models by method R for stature of Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 80: 975-978.
28. PATTERSON H.D., Thompson R. (1971). Recovery of interblock information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58: 545-554.
29. SEARLE S.R. (1982). Matrix algebra useful for statisticians. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
30. TEMPELMAN R.J., BURNSIDE E.B. (1990). Additive and nonadditive genetic variation for production traits in Canadian Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 73: 2206-2213.
31. VANRADEN P.M., LAWLOR T.J., SHORT T.H., HOESCHELE I. (1992). Use of reproductive technology to estimate variances and predict effects of gene interactions. J. Dairy Sci. 75: 2892-2901.
32. VARONA L., MISZTAL I., BERTRAND J.K., LAWLOR T.J. (1998). Effect of full-sibs on additive breeding values under the dominance model for stature in United States Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 81: 1126-1135.
33. VARONA L., MISZTAL I. (1999). Prediction of parental dominance combinations for planned matings, methodology, and simulation results. J. Dairy Sci. 82: 2186-2191.