Using the CABLES model to assess and minimize risk in research: Control group hazards

Ethics and Behavior

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 75-86

  Koocher, Gerald P ^a  

^a SIMMONS COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Human subjects protection; Research ethics; Research participants' research risk

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROL GROUP; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MENTAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESEARCH SUBJECT; RISK; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CONTROL GROUPS; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; RISK; STEREOTYPING; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;

EID: 0036044124     PISSN: 10508422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327019EB1201_5     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Annas, G. J., & Grodin, M. A. (Eds.). (1995). The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg code: Human rights in human experimentation. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Bayer, R. (1989). Private acts, social consequences: AIDS and the politics of public health. New York: Free Press.
3. Boudewyns, P. A., & Shipley, R. H. (1983). Flooding and implosive therapy: Direct therapeutic exposure in clinical practice. New York: Plenum.
4. Burris, S., & Gostin, L. (1997). Genetic screening from a public health perspective: Some lessons from the HIV experience. In M. A. Rothstein (Ed.), Privacy and confidentiality in the genetic era (pp. 137-158). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, Volume 1, Parts 1 to 199 (Revised as of October 1, 1999) Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
6. Darou, W. G., Hum, A., & Kurtness, J. (1993). An investigation of the impact of psychosocial research on a native population. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24, 325-329.
7. Fisher, C. B., & Wallace, S. A. (2000). Through the community looking glass: Re-evaluating the ethical and policy implications of research on adolescent risk and psychopathology. Ethics & Behavior, 10, 99-118.
8. Gamble, V. N. (1993). A legacy of distrust: African Americans and medical research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 9, 35-38.
9. Harris, Y., Gorelick, P. B., Samuels, P., & Bempong, I. (1996). Why African Americans may not be participating in clinical trials. Journal of the National Medical Center, 88, 630-634.
10. Hudson, K. L., Rothenburg, K. H., Andrews, L. B., Kahn, M. J. E., & Collins, F. S. (1995). Genetic discrimination and health insurance: An urgent need for reform. Science, 270, 391-393.
11. Koocher, G. P. (1991). Questionable methods in alcoholism research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 246-248.
12. Koocher, G. P., & Keith-Spiegel, P. C. (1990). Children, ethics, and the law: Professional standards and cases. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
13. Lapham, E. V., Kozma, C., & Weiss, J. O. (1996). Genetic discrimination: Perspectives of consumers. Science, 274, 621-624.
14. Melton, G. B., Levine, R. J., Koocher, G. P., Rosenthal, R., & Thompson, W. C. (1988). Community consultation in socially sensitive research: Lessons from clinical trials of treatment for AIDS. American Psychologist, 43, 573-580.
15. Milgram, S. (1983). Obedience to authority. New York: HarperCollins.
16. Moreno, J., Caplan, A. L., & Wolpe, P. R. (1998). Updating protections for human subjects involved in research (policy perspectives). Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 1951-1958.
17. Nathan, P. E., & Gorman, J. M. (Eds.). (1998). A guide to treatments that work. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Norton, I. M., & Manson, S. M. (1996). Research in American Indian and Alaska Native communities: Navigating the cultural universe of values and process. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 856-860.
19. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1992). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teachers expectation and pupils' intellectual development. New York: Irvington.
20. Sales, B. D., & Folkman, S. (Eds.). (2000). Ethics in research with human participants. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21. Sieber, J. E. (1992). Planning ethically responsible research: A guide for students and internal review boards. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22. Skelton, J. A., Pepe, M. M., & Pineo, T. S. (1995). How much better is clozapine? A meta-analytic review and critical appraisal. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 3, 270-279.
23. Stanley, B. H., Sieber, J. E., & Melton, G. B. (Eds.). (1996). Research ethics: A psychological approach. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
24. Wolf, L. E., & Lo, B. (1999). Practicing safer research: Using the law to protect sensitive research data. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 21, 4-7.