Positive feedback in the self-organizing model as an analog for the magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling during a substorm

Geomagnetism and Aeronomy

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 437-444

  Kozelov, B V ^a   Kozelova, T V ^a  

^a POLAR GEOPHYSICAL INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GEOMAGNETIC STORM; IONOSPHERE; MAGNETOSPHERE;

EID: 0036038839     PISSN: 00167932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Akasofu, S.-I., The Development of the Auroral Substorm, Planet. Space Sci., 1964, vol. 12, p. 273.
2. Bak, P., How Nature Works. The Science of Self-Organized Criticality, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1997.
3. Bak, P., Tang, C., and Wiesenfeld, K., Self-Organized Criticality, Phys. Rev. A: Gen. Phys., 1988, vol. 38, no. 1, p. 364.
4. Burlaga, L.F., Multifractal Structure of the Interplanetary Magnetic Field: Voyager 2 Observations near 25 AU, 1987-1988, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1991, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 69.
5. Chang, T., Multiscale Intermittent Turbulence in the Magnetotail, SUBSTORM-4, Kokubun, S. and Kamide, Y., Eds., Kluwer Academic Publ., 1998, p. 431.
6. Chapman, S.C., Watkins, N.W., Dendy, R.O., et al., A Simple Avalanche Model as an Analog for Magnetospheric Activity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1998, vol. 25, no. 13, p. 2397.
7. Elpinstone, R.D., Hearn, D.J., Cogger, L.L., et al., Observations in the Vicinity of Substorm Onset: Implications for the Substorm Process, J. Geophys. Res., 1995, vol. 100, p. 7937.
8. Jensen, H.J., Self-Organized Criticality, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1998.
9. Klimas, A.J., Vassiliadis, D., Baker, D.N., and Roberts, D.A., The Organized Nonlinear Dynamics of the Magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 1996, vol. 101, no. 6, p. 13089.
10. Koskinen, H.E.J., Lopez, R.E., Pellinen, R.J., et al., Pseudo-breakup and Substorm Growth Phase in the Ionosphere and Magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 1993, vol. 98, p. 5801.
11. Kozelov, B.V. and Kozelova, T.V., Spontaneous and Stimulated Events in the Self-Organizing System and Their Similarity to Magnetospheric Substorms, Geomagn. Aeron., 2002, vol. 42, no. 1, p. 59.
12. Lui, A.T.Y., Chapman, S.C., Liou, K., et al., Is the Dynamic Magnetosphere an Avalanching System?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2000, vol. 27, no. 7, p. 911.
13. Milovanov, A.V., Zelenyi, L.M., and Zimbardo, G., Fractal Structures and Power Law Spectra in the Distant Earth's Magnetotail, J. Geophys. Res., 1996, vol. 101, no. 9, p. 19903.
14. Nakamura, R., Baker, D.N., Yamamoto, T., et al., Particle and Field Signatures during Pseudobreakup and Major Expansion Onset, J. Geophys. Res., 1994, vol. 99, no. 1, p. 207.
15. Ohtani, S., Anderson, B.J., Sibeck, D.G., et al., A Multisatellite Study of a Pseudo-Substorm Onset in the Near-Earth Magnetotail, J. Geophys. Res., 1993, vol. 98, p. 19 355.
16. Takalo, J. and Timonen, J., Nonlinear Energy Dissipation in a Cellular Automaton Magnetotail Field Model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1999, vol. 26, no. 13, p. 1813.
17. Takalo, J., Timonen, J., and Koskinen, H., Correlation Dimension and Affinity of AE Data and Bicolored Noise, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1993, vol. 20, no. 15, p. 1527.
18. Uritskii, V.M. and Pudovkin, M.I., Fractal Dynamics of the AE Index of Solar Activity as Possible Criticality Manifestation in the Magnetosphere, Geomagn. Aeron., 1998, vol. 38, no. 3, p. 17.
19. Vespignani, A. and Zapperi, S., How Self-Organized Criticality Works: A Unified Mean-Field Picture, Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Phys., Plasmas, Fluids, Relat. Interdiscip. Top., 1998, vol. 57, no. 6, p. 6345.
20. Vörös, Z., Synergetic Approach to Substorm Phenomenon, Magnetospheric Substorms, 1991, no. 64, p. 461.