E-Z Derm™ a porcine heterograft material

American Journal of Clinical Dermatology

Volumn 3, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 507-

  Lawin, P B ^a   Silverstein, P ^b   Still, J M J ^c  

^a Brennen Medical Inc ^*  (United States)

^b Paul Silverstein Burn Center   (United States)

^c Doctor's Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BURN; DISEASE TRANSMISSION; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SAFETY; SWINE; WOUND DRESSING; XENOGRAFT;

EID: 0036038647     PISSN: 11750561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2165/00128071-200203070-00007     Document Type: Letter

References (11)

1. 1. B Bromberg I Song M Mohn 1965 The use of pigskin as a temporary biological dressing Plast Reconstr Surg 36 1 80 90 14310550 10.1097/00006534-196507000-00011 1:STN:280:DyaF2M7hsFajsg%3D%3D Bromberg B, Song I, Mohn M. The use of pigskin as a temporary biological dressing. Plast Reconstr Surg 1965; 36 (1): 80–90
2. 2. IC Song B Bromberg M Mohn 1966 Heterografts as biological dressings for large skin wounds Surgery 59 4 576 83 5326469 1:STN:280:DyaF287isFejuw%3D%3D Song IC, Bromberg B, Mohn M, et al. Heterografts as biological dressings for large skin wounds. Surgery 1966; 59 (4): 576–83
3. 3. Silverstein P, Curreri P, Munster A. Evaluation of fresh, viable porcine cutaneous xenograft as a temporary burn wound cover. Houston (TX): US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Brooke Army Medical Center, July 1 1970-June 30 1971
4. 4. P Silverstein 1973 The development of porcine cutaneous xenograft as a biologic dressing Hosp Car 4 6 Silverstein P. The development of porcine cutaneous xenograft as a biologic dressing. Hosp Care 1973; Mar: 4–6, 15-6
5. 5. R Ersek H Hachen 1980 Porcine xenografts in the treatment of pressure ulcers Ann Plast Surg 5 6 464 7193428 10.1097/00000637-198012000-00009 1:STN:280:DyaL3M7jt1Sgsw%3D%3D Ersek R, Hachen H. Porcine xenografts in the treatment of pressure ulcers. Ann Plast Surg 1980; 5 (6): 464
6. 6. R Ersek G Umesh G Surak 1986 A new wound dressing that solves the retention and storage problems: a clinical history Contemp Surg 28 3 21 Ersek R, Umesh G, Surak G, et al. A new wound dressing that solves the retention and storage problems: a clinical history. Contemp Surg 1986; 28 (3): 21
7. 7. J Still E Law B Craft-Coffman 1996 An evaluation of excision with application of autografts or porcine xenografts within 24 hours of burn injury Ann Plast Surg 36 2 176 9 8919383 10.1097/00000637-199602000-00013 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FnvVCmuw%3D%3D Still J, Law E, Craft-Coffman B. An evaluation of excision with application of autografts or porcine xenografts within 24 hours of burn injury. Ann Plast Surg 1996; 36 (2): 176–9
8. 8. J Still E Law K Belcher 1996 Decrease length of hospital stay by early excision and grafting of burns South Med J 89 6 578 82 8638196 10.1097/00007611-199606000-00005 Still J, Law E, Belcher K, et al. Decrease length of hospital stay by early excision and grafting of burns. South Med J 1996; 89 (6): 578–82
9. 9. J Still K Donker E Law 1997 A program to decrease hospital stay in acute burn patients Burns 23 6 498 500 9429030 10.1016/S0305-4179(97)00044-2 1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FptVOhug%3D%3D Still J, Donker K, Law E, et al. A program to decrease hospital stay in acute burn patients. Burns 1997; 23 (6): 498–500
10. 10. J Still E Law 2000 Primary excision of the burn wound Clin Plast Surg 27 1 23 10665354 Still J, Law E. Primary excision of the burn wound. Clin Plast Surg 2000; 27 (1): 23
11. 11. D Davis C Arpey 2000 Porcine heterografts in dermatologic surgery and reconstruction Dermatol Surg 26 1 76 80 10632692 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2000.99198.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czpt1emug%3D%3D Davis D, Arpey C. Porcine heterografts in dermatologic surgery and reconstruction. Dermatol Surg 2000; 26 (1): 76–80