Addressing evaluative standards related to program assessment: How do we respond?

Journal of Social Work Education

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 369-382

  Garcia, John A ^a   Floyd, Charles E ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036035508     PISSN: 10437797     EISSN: 21635811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10437797.2002.10779105     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Buchan, V. (1991). To assess or not to assess is not longer the question: Potential of program monitoring. Journal of Social Work Education, 27, 25-33.
2. Council on Social Work Education. (1994). Handbook of Accreditation Standards and Procedures (4th ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author.
3. Council on Social Work Education. (1999). Directory of colleges and universities with accredited social work degree programs 1999. Alexandria, VA: Author.
4. Council on Social Work Education. (2001). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Retrieved August 14, 2002, from http://www.cswe.org/epas
5. Dalton, B., & Wright, L. (1999). Using community input for the curriculum review process. Journal of Social Work Education, 35, 275-288.
6. Holden, G., Barker, K., Meenaghan, T., & Rosenberg, G. (1999). Research self-efficacy: A new possibility for educational outcomes assessment. Journal of Social Work Education, 35, 463-475.
7. Hull, G., Mather, J., Christerpherson, P., & Y oung, C. (1994). Quality assurance in social work education: A comparison of outcome assessment across the continuum. Journal of Social Work Education, 30, 388-396.
8. Kamoeka, V., & Lister, L. (1991). Evaluation of student learning outcomes in MSW programs. Journal of Social Work Education, 27, 251-257.
9. Pike, C. (1998). A validation study of an instrument designed to measure teaching effectiveness. Journal of Social Work Education, 34, 261-271