Court of hope and false expectations: Land and environment court 21 years on

Journal of Environmental Law

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 301-315

  Ryan, Patricia ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; LAND MANAGEMENT; LEGAL SYSTEM;

EID: 0036033689     PISSN: 09528873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jel/14.3.301     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Proliferation and fragmentation of the Australian court system
2. The case for creating a special environmental court system: A further comment
3. Professor David Hall memorial lecture
4. The environmental planning and assessment court system
5. Amendments to land and environment court jurisdiction: A slow Saga
6. The role of the New South Wales land and environment court in the emergence of public interest environmental law
7. Governmental and judicial functions in the NSW planning process
8. Town planning by judges: The county of Cumberland scheme in New South Wales
9. The role and work of valuation boards and courts in the community
10. A guide to the history and function of the New South Wales building and subdivision boards of appeal
11. Administrative discretion, officials, experts and the public
12. Limits on the use of judges
13. Planning, politics and the judges
14. The town planning appeals tribunal: Constitution, procedures and role
15. Jurisdictional fact: A dilemma for the courts
16. The environmental impact statement threshold test: When is an activity likely to significantly affect the environment?
17. The effectiveness of the courts in achieving the goals of environment protection legislation
18. New directions in the prevention and resolution of environmental disputes: Specialist environmental courts
19. NSW land and environment court: Its contribution to Australia's development of environmental law
20. Garner lecture 1991 'Are the judiciary environmentally myopic?'
21. Land court still a mess: Locals reject government reforms
22. Acceptance of the precautionary principle: Australian vs international decision-makers
23. The role of specialist courts: An Australian perspective