The third leg of the antitrust stool

Journal of Public Policy and Marketing

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 227-231

  Foer, Albert A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036027220     PISSN: 07439156     EISSN: 15477207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1509/jppm.21.2.227.17573     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. ABA Section of Antitrust Law (2001), "Perspectives on Fundamental Antitrust Theory," report of the Task Force on Fundamental Theory, (July), 1-475, (accessed September 16, 2002), [available at www.abanet.org/ftp/fundamentaltheory.pdf].
2. Ansoff, H. Igor, et al. (1970), "Does Planning Pay? The Effect of Planning on the Success of Acquisitions in American Firms," Long Range Planning, 3 (December) 2-7.
3. Armstrong, Scott (1982), "The Value of Formal Planning for Strategic Decisions: Review of the Empirical Research," Strategic Management Journal, 3, 197-211.
4. Best, Roger J. (1974), "An Experiment in Delphi Estimation in Marketing Decision Making," Journal of Marketing Research, 11 (November), 447-68.
5. Crew, Eugene (1986), "The Chicago School Teaches the Supreme Court a Dubious Lesson," Antitrust, (Fall), 11, 12.
6. Foer, Albert A. (1999), "The Future and Antitrust," FTC: WATCH, 530 (October 11), (accessed September 16, 2002), [available at http://www.antitrustinstitute.org/recent/43.cfm].
7. Gerla, Harry S. (1985), "The Psychology of Predatory Pricing: Why Predatory Pricing Pays," Southwestern Law Journal, 39, 755-80.
8. Jolson, Marvin and Gerald Rossow (1971), "The Delphi Process in Marketing Decision Making," Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (November), 443-48.
9. Klein, Burton (1977), Dynamic Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Kolasky, William J. (2002), "Comparative Merger Control Analysis: Six Guiding Principles for Antitrust Agencies-New and Old," presented at the International Bar Association Conference on Competition Law and Policy in a Global Context, Cape Town, South Africa (March 18), (accessed September 16, 2002), [available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/speeches/10845. htm].
11. Kramer, Robert (2001), "Perspectives on Fundamental Antitrust Theory," report of the Task Force on Fundamental Theory, (July), 400-401, (accessed September 16, 2002), [available at www.abanet.org/ftp/fundamentaltheory.pdf].
12. Kwoka John E., Jr., and Lawrence J. White, eds. (1999), The Antitrust Revolution, 3d ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Lowenstein, Roger (2001), "Exuberance Is Rational (or at Least Human)," NY Times Magazine, (February 11).
14. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio (1986), 106 S. Ct. 1348.
15. Porter, Michael E. (1981), "Strategic Interaction: Some Lessons from Industry Histories for Theory and Antitrust Policy," in FTC, Strategy, Predation, and Antitrust Analysis, Steven C. Salop, ed. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission, 449-506.
16. _ (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press.
17. Posner, Richard A. (2001), Antitrust Law IX, 2d ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
18. Rowe, Gene and George Wright (1999), "The Delphi Technique as a Forecasting Tool: Issues and Analysis," International Journal of Forecasting, 14 (4), 353-375.
19. Scherer, F.M. (2001), "Some Principles for Post-Chicago Antitrust Analysis," Case Western Reserve Law Review, 52, 1, 18.