Limiting product choice: Innovation, market evolution, and antitrust

Journal of Public Policy and Marketing

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 269-274

  Petty, Ross D ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036027216     PISSN: 07439156     EISSN: 15477207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1509/jppm.21.2.269.17583     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. Indian Head (1988), 486 U.S. 492.
2. Andrx Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Friedman (2000), 83 F. Supp. 2d 179 (D.D.C.).
3. Averitt, Neil W. and Robert H. Lande (1997), "Consumer Sovereignty: A Unified Theory of Antitrust and Consumer Protection Law," Antitrust Law Journal, 65 (3), 713-56.
4. Bayus, Barry L., Sanjay Jain, and Ambar G. Rao (2001), "Truth or Consequences: An Analysis of Vaporware and New Product Announcements," Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (February), 3-13.
5. Berkey Photo Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co. (1979), 603 F.2d 263 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 (1980).
6. Besser Mfg. Co. v. U.S. (1952), 343 U.S. 444.
7. Biovail Corp. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel North America Inc. (1999), 49 F. Supp. 2d 750 (D.N.J.).
8. Clamp-All Corp. v. Cast Iron Soil Pipe Institute (1988), 851 F.2d 478 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1007 (1989).
9. Consolidated Metal Products Inc. v. American Petroleum Institute (1988), 846 F.2d 284 (5th Cir.).
10. Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & blass Co. (1980), 448 U.S. 176.
11. Dell Computer Corp., In re (1996), 121 F.T.C. 616.
12. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services Inc. (1992), 504 U.S. 451.
13. Federal Trade Commission (1995), "Glaxo to Settle FTC Charges Will Divest Wellcome Assets to Consummate Merger," FTC News Release, (March 16), (accessed September 4, 2002), [available at www.ftc.gov].
14. _ (1998), "Summit and VISX Settle FTC Charges of Violating Antitrust Laws," FTC News Release, (August 21).
15. _ (2000), "FTC Charges Drug Manufacturers with Stifling Competition in Two Prescription Drug Markets," FTC News Release, (March 16).
16. _ (2002), "Wrongful 'Orange Book' Listing Raises Red Flag with FTC; Leads to Consent Order with Biovail Corp. Concerning Its Drug Tiazac," FTC News Release, (April 23).
17. Foster, Richard (1986), Innovation: The Attacker's Advantage. New York: Summit Books.
18. General Foods, In re (1984), 103 FTC 204.
19. Ghemawat, Pankaj (1986), "Sustainable Advantage," Harvard Business Review, 64 (September-October), 53-58.
20. Gundlach, Gregory T. and Paul N. Bloom (1993), "The 'Essential Facility' Doctrine: Legal Limits and Antitrust Considerations," Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12 (Fall), 156-69.
21. Handgards Inc. v. Ehicon Inc. (1984), 743 F.2d 1282 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190 (1985).
22. Heil, Oliver P. and Arlen W. Langvardt (1994), "The Interface Between Competitive Market Signaling and Antitrust Law." Journal of Marketing, 58 (July), 81-96.
23. Intel Corp., In re (1999), 1999 FTC LEXIS 145.
24. Intergraph Corp. v. Intel Corp. (1999), 195 F.3d 1346 (Fed.Cr.).
25. Kotler, Philip ( 1991 ), Marketing Management, 7th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26. Lande, Robert H. (2001), "Consumer Choice as the Ultimate Goal of Antitrust," University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 62 (Spring) 503-25.
27. Leary, Thomas B. (2001), "The Significance of Variety in Antitrust Analysis," Antitrust Law Journal, 68 (3), 1007-22.
28. Leventis, Andrew and Michelle R. Appelrouth (2001), "The Legal Viability of Vaporware Claims," Antitrust, 15 (2), 82-87.
29. Levitt, Theodore (1965), "Exploit the Product Life Cycle," Harvard Business Review, 43 (November/December), 81-94.
30. Mitchener, Brandon and Kevin J. Delaney (2000), "EU Launches Probe of Microsoft's Windows 2000," The Wall Street Journal, (June 13), A113, A15.
31. National Macaroni Manufacturers Ass'n v. FTC (1965), 345 F.2d 421 (7th Cir.).
32. Northeastern Tel. Co. v. AT&T Co. (1981), 651 F.2d 76 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 (1982).
33. Petty, Ross D. (1988), "Antitrust and Innovation: Are Product Modifications Ever Predatory?" Suffolk University Law Review, 22 (4), 997-1028.
34. _ (2001) "Limiting Product Choice: A Consolidation of Antitrust Theory," in Marketing and Public Policy Conference Proceedings, Vol. 11, Ronald Paul Hill and Charles R. Taylor, eds. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, 115-25.
35. Porter, Michael (1985), Competitive Advantage. New York: The Free Press.
36. _ (2001), "Competition and Antitrust: Toward a Productivity-Based Approach to Evaluating Mergers and Joint Ventures," Antitrust Bulletin, 66 (Winter), 919-58.
37. Professional Real Estate Investors Inc. w Columbia Pictures Inc. (1993), 113 S. Ct. 1920.
38. Royall, M. Scan (2001), "Coping with the Antitrust Risks of Technological Integration," Antitrust Law Journal, 68 (3), 1023-61.
39. Salop, Steven C. and David T. Scheffman (1983), "Raising Rivals' Costs," American Economic Review, 73 (2), 267-71.
40. Scherer, F.M. (1980), Industrial Market Power and Economic Performance, 2d ed. Chicago: Rand MCNally.
41. Schumpeter, J. (1950), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, 3d ed. New York: Harper.
42. Shapiro, Carl (2001), "Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools and Standard Setting," (accessed September 4, 2002), available at http://haas.berkeley.edu/̃shapiro/thicket.pdf].
43. Sullivan, Lawrence and Warren Grimes (2000), The Law of Antitrust. Eagan, MN: West Group Publishing.
44. Telex Corp v. IBM Corp. (1975), 510 F.2d 894 (10th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 423 U.S. 802.
45. Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. U.S. (1951), 341 U.S. 593.
46. U.S. v. Grinnell Corp. (1966), 384 U.S. 563.
47. _ v. Microsoft Corp. (1998), 147 F.3d 935 (Fed. Cir.).
48. _ v. _ (2000), 87 F. Supp.2d 30 (D.D.C.).
49. _ v. Terminal R.R. Ass'n (1912), 224 U.S. 383.
50. U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission (1995), Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property, (accessed September 4, 2002), [available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/guidelines/ipguide.htm].
51. _ (2002), Antitrust Guidelines for Collaborations Among Competitors, (accessed September 4, 2002), [available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/guidelines/guidelin.htm].
52. Walker Process Equip. Inc. v. Food Mach.& Chem. Corp. (1965), 382 U.S. 172.
53. Weller, Charles D. (2001), "Harmonizing Antitrust Worldwide by Evolving to Michael Porter's Dynamic Productivity Growth Analysis," Antitrust Bulletin, 66 (Winter), 879-917.