Research ethics and scientific misconduct in biomedical research

Acta Neurochirurgica, Supplement

Volumn , Issue 83, 2002, Pages 11-15

  Kansu, Emin ^a   Ruacan, S ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Research Ethics; Scientific Fraud; Scientific Misconduct

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL; ETHICS; HUMAN; NEUROSURGERY; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

CLINICAL TRIALS; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; NEUROSURGERY; PUBLISHING; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 0036025349     PISSN: 00651419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6743-4_3     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Altman L, Melcher L (1983) Fraud in science. Brit Med J 286: 2003-2006
2. American College of Physicians (1998) Ethics Manual 4th edn. Ann Intern Med 128: 576-594
3. Andersen D, Attrup L, Axelsen N, Riis P (1992) Scientific Dishonesty and Good Clinical Practice. Published by the Danish Medical Research Council
4. Angell M (1986) Publish or perish: A proposal. Ann Int Med 104: 261-262
5. Angell M, Relman AS (1988) Fraud in biomedical research: A time for congressional restraint. NEJM 318: 1462-1463
6. Culver CM, Clouser KD, Gert B, Brody H, Fletcher J, Jonsen A, Kopelman L, Lynn J, Siegler M, Wikler D (1985) Special report: Basic curricular goals in medical ethics. NEJM 312: 253-256
7. Darsee Affair (1983) Retractions. New Engl J Med 308: 1400
8. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) (1991) First annual report: scientific misconduct investigations reviewed by office scientific integrity review, March 1989-Dec 1990. Office of Scientific Integrity Review, Washington DC, USA
9. Erkut S, Mokros JR (1984) Professors as "models" and "mentors" for college students. Am Educ Res J 21: 399-417
10. Ethical Issues in Biomedical Publication (2000) In: Jones AH, McLellan F (eds) The Johns Hopkins Univ Press
11. Freedman B (1987) Scientific value and validity as ethical requirements for research: A proposed explication. IRB 9: 7-10
12. Gunsalus CK (1999) The Baltimore case: A trial of politics, science and character. In: Kevles DJ (ed) (Book review). NEJM 340: 242
13. Harvard Medical School (1988) Guidelines for investigators in scientific research. Cambridge Massachusetts
14. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (1997) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. JAMA 277: 927-934
15. Jonsen AR, Siegler M, Winslade WJ (1992) Clinical Ethics, 3rd Edn. McGraw-Hill
16. Karasz F (1996) Publication ethics and basic sciences. Symposium Proceedings on Publication Ethics. Published by TUBITAK, Ankara
17. Petersdorf RG (1982) Preventing and investigating fraud in research. J Med Educ 57: 880-881
18. Petersdorf RG (1986) The pathogenesis of fraud in medical science. Ann Int Med 107: 252-254
19. Relman AS (1985) Dealing with conflicts of interest. N Engl J Med 313: 749-751
20. Responsible Science (1992) Ensuring the integrity of the research process, vol. I. Prepared and published by the National Academy of Sciences, USA, Washington DC
21. Shapiro MF, Charrow RP (1985) Scientific misconduct in investigational drug trials. NEJM 312: 731-736
22. Swazey JP, Anderson MS, Lewis KS (1993) Ethical problems in academic research. Am Scie 81: 542-553
23. Thompson DF (1993) Understanding financial conflicts of interest. N Engl J Med 329: 573-576
24. Woolf PK (1986) Pressure to publish and fraud in science, Ann Int Med 104: 254-256
25. World Medical Association (2000) Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 283: 3043-3045