Suppressing visual feedback in written composition: Effects on processing demands and coordination of the writing processes

International Journal of Psychology

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 209-218

  Olive, Thierry ^a   Piolat, Annie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 8   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036021556     PISSN: 00207594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207590244000089     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Atwell, M. (1981). The evolution of text: The interrelation of reading and writing in the composing process. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Indiana.
2. Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (1994). Is written language production more difficult than oral language production? A working memory approach. International Journal of Psychology, 29, 591-620.
3. Brown, J.S., McDonald, J.L., Brown, T.L., & Carr, T.H. (1988). Adapting to processing demands in discourse production: The case of handwriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 45-59.
4. Chafe, W.L. (1982). Integration and involvement in speaking, writing and oral literature. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy, Vol. 9, Advances in discourse comprehension (pp. 35-53). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5. Coirier, P., & Andriessen, J. (Eds.) (2000). Foundations of argumentative text processing. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
6. Dansac, C., & Passerault, J.-M. (1996). Effects of re-reading suppression on the temporal parameters in text production. Graphic presentation at the 1996 European Writing Conference, Barcelona, Spain, October.
7. Ellis, A.W. (1988). Normal writing processes and peripheral acquired dysgraphias. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, 99-127.
8. Ellis, A.W., Young, A.W., & Flude, B.M. (1987). "Afferent" dysgraphia in a patient and in normal subjects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, 99-127.
9. Fayol, M. (1999). Writing: From on-line management problems to strategies. In M. Torrance & G. Jeffery (Eds.), Cognitive demands of writing. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
10. Flamen, J.-P., & Piolat, A. (1999). On visual feedback in writing by 10-12-year-olds: An on-line approach. In M.-F. Crété & E. Espéret (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1998 Writing Conference (pp. 383-384). Poitiers, France: MSHS, University of Poitiers.
11. Galbraith, D., & Sumpner, C. (1996). Effects of reduced visual feedback on writing. Graphic presentation at the 1996 European Writing Conference, Barcelona, Spain, October.
12. Gould, J.D. (1980). Experiments on composing letters: Some facts, some myths, and some observations. In L.W. Gregg & E.R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 98-127). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Grabowski, J. (1999). Verbal modes of knowledge diagnosis: The writing superiority effect. In M.-F. Crété & E. Espéret (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1998 Writing Conference (pp. 11-16). Poitiers, France: MSHS, University of Poitiers.
14. Graham, S., & Weintraub, N. (1996). A review of handwriting research: Progress and prospects from 1980 to 1994. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 7-87.
15. Hayes, J.R., & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of the writing processes. In L.W. Gregg & E.S. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
16. Hull, G.A., & Smith, W.L. (1983). Interrupting visual feedback in writing. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57, 963-978.
17. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18. Kellogg, R.T. (1987). Effects of topic knowledge on the allocation of processing time and cognitive effort to writing processes. Memory and Cognition, 15, 256-266.
19. Kellogg, R.T. (1994). The psychology of writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Kellogg, R.T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In C.M. Levy & S.E. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 57-71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Kellogg, R.T. (1999). Components of working memory in writing. In M. Torrance & G.C. Jeffery (Eds.), The cognitive demands of writing (pp. 25-42). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
22. Kellogg R.T. (2001). Competition for working memory among writing processes. American Journal of Psychology, 114, 175-192.
23. Kerr, B. (1973). Processing demands during mental operations. Memory and Cognition, 1, 401-412.
24. Levy, C.M. & Ransdell, S.E. (1995). Is writing as difficult as it seems? Memory and Cognition, 23, 767-779.
25. Levy, C.M. & Ransdell, S.E. (1996). Writing signatures. In C.M. Levy & S.E. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 149-161). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. McCutchen, D. (1988). Functional automaticity in children's writing: A problem of metacognitive control. Written Communication, 5, 306-324.
27. McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 299-325.
28. Olive, T. (1999). Economie de la production de textes: Gestion des ressources attentionnelles et mode d'activation des processus rédactionnels [Economy of text composition: Management of cognitive resources and activation of the writing processes]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Provence.
29. Olive, T., & Kellogg, R.T. (in press). Concurrent activation of high- and low-level production processes in written composition. Memory and Cognition.
30. Olive, T., Kellogg, R.T., & Piolat, A. (2001). The triple-task technique for studying the process of writing. In T. Olive & C.M. Levy (Eds.), Contemporary tools and techniques for studying writing (pp. 31-58). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
31. Olive, T., Piolat, A., & Roussey, J.-Y. (1997). Effort cognitif et mobilisation des processus en production de textes: Effet de l'habileté rédactionnelle et du niveau de connaissances [Cognitive effort and time processing of the writing processes: Writing skill and level of knowledge]. In D. Mellier & A. vam Hoffe (Eds.), Attention et contrôle cognitif: Mécanismes, développement des habiletés, pathologies (pp. 71-85). Rouen, France: Publications de l'Université de Rouen.
32. Piolat, A. (1982). L'écrit et l'oral comme systèmes de production verbale [Writing and speaking as systems of verbal production]. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Provence, France.
33. Piolat, A., & Olive, T. (2000). Comment étudier le coût et le déroulement de la rédaction de textes? La méthode de tripletâche: Un bilan méthodologique [How to study the cost and unfolding of text composition? The triple task method]. L'Année Psychologique, 100, 465-502.
34. Piolat, A., Olive, T., Roussey, J.-Y., Thunin, O., & Ziegler, J.C. (1999). Scriptkell: A computer assisted tool for measuring the relative distribution of time and cognitive effort in writing and other tasks. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 31, 113-121.
35. Piolat, A., Roussey, J.-Y., Olive, T., & Farioli, F. (1996). Charge mentale et mobilisation des processus rédactionnels: Examen de la procédure de Kellogg [Cognitive load and activation of the writing processes: Assessing Kellogg's method]. Psychologic Française, 41, 339-354.
36. Smyth, M.M., & Silvers, G. (1987). Functions of vision in the control of handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 65, 47-64.
37. Teleman, U. (1981). On visual feedback in writing. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of Applied Linguistics (pp. 424-425). Lund, Sweden: Lund University.
38. Van Doorn, R.R.A., & Keuss, P.J.G. (1992). The role of vision in the temporal and spatial control of handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 81, 269-286.
39. Van Doorn, R.R.A., & Keuss, P.J.G. (1993). Does the production of letter strokes in handwriting benefits from vision? Acta Psychologica, 82, 275-290.
40. Van Galen, G.P. (1991). Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory. Human Movement Science, 10, 165-191.
41. Van Galen, G.P., Smyth, M.M., Meulenbroek, R.G.J., & Hylkema, H. (1989). The role of short-term memory and the motor buffer in handwriting under visual and nonvisual guidance. In R. Plamondon, C.Y. Suen, & M.L. Simner (Eds.), Computer recognition and human production of handwriting (pp. 253-271). Singapore: World Scientific.
42. Zesiger, P. (1995). Ecrire. Approches cognitive, neuropsychologique et développementale [Writing: Cognitive, neuropsychological and developmental approaches]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.