메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 218-220

Commentary: The search for a formula to relate competence, coercion, and mandated treatment

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETENCE; INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT; MENTAL HEALTH; NOTE; OUTPATIENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; SELF CONCEPT; SELF REPORT; CLASSIFICATION; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MENTAL CAPACITY; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIES; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; TREATMENT REFUSAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036019089     PISSN: 10936793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note
Times cited : (3)

References (19)
  • 2
    • 0009732618 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418 (1979) (quoting In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970))
  • 5
    • 0032880657 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Least restrictive alternative revisited: Olmstead's uncertain mandate for community-based care
    • (1999) Psychiatr Serv , vol.50 , pp. 1271-1272
    • Appelbaum, P.S.1
  • 7
  • 8
    • 0009734236 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Olmstead v. U.S., 277 U.S. 438, 478 (1928)
  • 10
    • 0009732619 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • O'Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563, 575 (1975)
  • 13
    • 0009698021 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital, Inc., 497 N.E.2d 626, 638 (1986)


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.