|
Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 389-398
|
How comparable are tests of apraxia?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
APRAXIA;
ARTICLE;
BRAIN INJURY;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
CLINICAL EXAMINATION;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CORRELATION FUNCTION;
DIAGNOSTIC TEST;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LEFT HEMISPHERE;
MALE;
REHABILITATION CENTER;
RELIABILITY;
SCORING SYSTEM;
STANDARDIZATION;
UNITED KINGDOM;
AGNOSIA;
CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
MIDDLE AGED;
NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
AGED;
AGNOSIA;
APRAXIA, IDEOMOTOR;
APRAXIAS;
CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGE;
NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
HUMANS;
MIDDLE AGED;
|
EID: 0036019020
PISSN: 02692155
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1191/0269215502cr493oa Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (25)
|
References (25)
|