Some hazards to neutrality in the psychoanalysis of candidates

Psychoanalytic Quarterly

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 419-443

  Orgel, Shelley ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; ARTICLE; COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PSYCHIATRIST; PSYCHOANALYSIS; TRAINING; ADULT; EDUCATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MENTAL DISEASE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC RELATIONS;

ADULT; AGGRESSION; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MENTAL DISORDERS; PSYCHOANALYSIS;

EID: 0036017671     PISSN: 00332828     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2167-4086.2002.tb00520.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Some observations on reality testing as a clinical concept
2. Analytic training and training analysis
3. What makes the training analysis good enough?
4. Notes on transference: Universal phenomenon and hardest part of analysis
5. The analyst as the conscience of the analysis
6. Narcissistic problems in analysis
7. The training analyst as an educator
8. The ego and the id
9. Analysis terminable and interminable
10. Changes in psychoanalytic patients up to the present day
11. Problems in psychoanalytic training
12. Problems of training analysis
13. Theoretical models and the analyst's neutrality
14. The self and the object world
15. The training analysis: A critical review of the literature and a controversial proposal
16. Internalization, separation, mourning and the super-ego
17. On internalization
18. Irreducible subjectivity and interactionism: A critique
19. The impact of training analysis
20. Letting go: Some thoughts on termination
21. The perils of neutrality
22. Getting real in analysis
23. Playing one's cards face up in analysis: An approach to the problem of self-disclosure
24. Countertransference, conflictual listening, and the analytic object relationship
25. Hearing voices: The fate of the analyst's identifications
26. The unobjectionable part of the transference