A comparative crossover evaluation of amlodipine and nifedipine GITS before and after a missed dose: 48-h blood pressure profiles

American Journal of Hypertension

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 580-582

  Nussinovitch, Naomi ^a,b   Rosenberg, Gilad ^a,b   Peleg, Edna ^a,b   Rosenthal, Talma ^a,b  

^a SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMLODIPINE; NIFEDIPINE; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT;

BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; BLOOD PRESSURE REGULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG TOLERABILITY; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; LETTER; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SIDE EFFECT; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DRUG EFFECT; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AMLODIPINE; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS; BLOOD PRESSURE; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; GASTROINTESTINAL SYSTEM; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NIFEDIPINE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; HUMANS;

EID: 0036015047     PISSN: 08957061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-7061(02)02924-2     Document Type: Letter

References (14)

1. The effects of missing dose of enalapril versus amlodipine on ambulatory blood pressure
2. Therapeutic implications of drug "holidays."
3. Trough peak ratio of the blood pressure response to dihydropyridine calcium antagonists
4. 24 Hour blood pressure profiles in patients with hypertension treated with amlodipine or nifedipine GITS
5. The 24 hour efficacy of a new once daily formulation of nifedipine
6. A comparative assessment of the duration of action of amlodipine and nifedipine GITS in normotensive subjects
7. Patient compliance and therapeutic coverage: Comparison of amlodipine and slow release nifedipine in the treatment of hypertension
8. Persistence of antihypertensive efficacy after missed doses: Comparison of amlodipine and nifedipine GITS
9. Prolonged antihypertensive effect of amlodipine: A prospective double blind randomized study
10. A comparison of amlodipine and nifedipine extended release in the treatment of hypertension at steady state and after two missed doses
11. Persistence of antihypertensive effect after "missed doses" of calcium antagonist with long (amlodipine) vs short (diltiazem) elimination half life
12. The pharmacokinetics of amlodipine in healthy volunteers after single intravenous and oral doses and after 14 repeated oral doses given once daily
13. Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double blind treatment with a long acting calcium channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS Study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT)
14. Different effects of nifedipine and amlodipine on circulating catecholamine levels in essential hypertensive patients