The variation in urodynamic practice in the United Kingdom

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 48-50

  Adekanmi, O A ^a   Edwards, G J ^a   Barrington, J W ^a  

^a SINGLETON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; LABORATORY TEST; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARDIZATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM; URINE INCONTINENCE; URODYNAMICS; UTILIZATION REVIEW; CLINICAL PRACTICE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; UROLOGIC EXAMINATION;

DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, UROLOGICAL; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 0036008238     PISSN: 01443615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01443610120101727     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary function
2. First report on the standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function
3. Interand intra-departmental variations of the perineal pad weighing test
4. Detrusor pressure uroflowmetry studies in women: Effect of a 7Fr transurethral catheter
5. Urethral pressure measurement by microtransducer: The results in symptom free women and in those with genuine stress incontinence
6. An assessment of urodynamic examination in incontinent women
7. The role of patient history in the diagnosis of urinary incontinence
8. Interpretation of urinary flow rates
9. Does urethral instrumentation affect uroflowmetry measurements
10. A reappraisal of the value of routine urological procedures in the assessment of urodynamic function