Visual search within and across dimensions: A case for within-dimension grouping

British Journal of Psychology

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 115-135

  Linnell, Karina J ^a   Humphreys, Glyn W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0036003070     PISSN: 20448295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000712602162472     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Allport, D. A. (1971). Parallel encoding within and between elementary stimulus dimensions. Perception and Psychophysics, 10, 104-108.
2. Bilsky, A. B., & Wolfe, J. M. (1995). Part-whole information is useful in size x size but not in orientation x orientation conjunction searches. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 749-760.
3. Carrasco, M., Ponte, D., Rechea, C., & Sampedro, M. J. (1998). 'Transient structures': The effects of practice and distractor grouping on within-dimension conjunction searches. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 1243-1258.
4. Cohen, A., & Magen, H. (1999). Intra-and cross-dimensional visual search for single-feature targets. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 291-307.
5. Crick, F. (1984). Function of the thalamic reticular complex: The search light hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 81, 4586-4590.
6. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
7. Duncan, J. (1993). Similarity between concurrent visual discriminations: Dimensions and objects. Perception and Psychophysics, 54, 425-430.
8. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
9. Grossberg, S., Mingolla, E., & Ross, W. (1994). A neural theory of attentive visual search: Interactions of boundary, surface, spatial, and object representations. Psychological Review, 101, 470-489.
10. Heathcote, A., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (1993). Representation and selection of relative position. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 488-516.
11. Humphreys, G. W., Quinlan, P. T., & Riddoch, M. J. (1989). Grouping processes in visual search: Effects with single-and combined-feature targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 258-279.
12. Linnell, K. J. (1992). Visual processing compared within and across dimensions. PhD thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
13. Linnell, K. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2001). Spatially parallel processing of within-dimension conjunctions. Perception, 30, 49-60.
14. Miller, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 247-279.
15. Moore, C. M., & Osman, A. M. (1993). Looking for two targets at the same time: One search or two? Perception and Psychophysics, 53, 381-390.
16. Müller, H. J., Heller, D., & Ziegler, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 1-17.
17. Pashler, H. (1987). Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis. Perception and Psychophysics, 41, 191-201.
18. Pomerantz, J. R., & Garner, W. R. (1973). Stimulus configuration in selective attention tasks. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 565-569.
19. Quinlan, P. T., & Humphreys, G. W. (1987). Visual search for targets defined by combinations of color, shape and size: An examination of the task constraints on feature and conjunction searches. Perception and Psychophysics, 41, 455-472.
20. Ross, W. D., & Mingolla, E. (1994). Grouping effects in visual search. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 35, 2081.
21. Sampedro, M. J., Rechea, C., & Ponte, D. (1998). Use of emergent properties as a 'guide' for within-dimension conjunction processing. Perception, S27, 67-68.
22. Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
23. Treisman, A., & Paterson, R. (1984). Emergent features, attention and object perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 12-31.
24. Wing, A., & Allport, D. A. (1972). Multidimensional encoding of visual form. Perception and Psychophysics, 12, 474-476.
25. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202-238.
26. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419-433.
27. Wolfe, J. M., Friedman-Hill, S. R., & Bilsky, A. B. (1994). Parallel processing of part/whole information in visual search tasks. Perception and Psychophysics, 55, 537-550.
28. Wolfe, J. M., Stewart, M. I., Friedman-Hill, S. R., Yu, K. P., Shorter, A. D., & Cave, K. R. (1990). limitations on the parallel guidance of visual search: Color x color and orientation x orientation conjunctions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 879-892.