The influence of federalism on fiscal policy making

European Journal of Political Research

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 115-145

  Braun, Dietmar ^a   Bullinger, Anne Béatrice ^b   Wälti, Sonja ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b Forum of Federations   (Canada)

^c GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036001495     PISSN: 03044130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.00006     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Abromeit, H. (1992). Der verkappte Einheitsstaat. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
2. Banting, K.G. (1987). The welfare state and Canadian federalism, 2nd edn. Montreal: McGill-Queens.
3. Banting, K.G. (1995). The welfare state as statecraft: Territorial politics and Canadian social policy. in S. Leibfried & P. Pierson (eds.), European social policy: Between fragmentation and integration. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
4. Baumol, W.J. & Blinder, A.S. (1988). Economics: Principles and policy, 4th edn. San Diego, CA/New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
5. Braun, D. (ed.) (2000). Public policy and federalism. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
6. Brock, K.L. (1995). The end of executive federalism? in F. Rocher & M. Smith (eds.), New trends in Canadian federalism. Peterborough: Broadview, pp. 91-108.
7. Busch, A. (1995). Preisstabilitätspolitik: Politik und Inflationsraten im internationalen Vergleich. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
8. Castles, F.G. (1999). Decentralization and the post-war political economy. European Journal of Political Research 36: 27-53.
9. Chandler, W.M. (1987). Federalism and political parties, in H. Bakvis & W.M. Chandler (eds.), Federalism and the role of the state. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 149-170.
10. Colomer, J.M. (1995). Game theory and the transition to democracy: The Spanish model. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
11. Croisat, M. (1995). Le fédéralisme dans les démocraties contemporaines, 2nd edn. Clefs/Politique. Paris: Montchrestien.
12. Dupré, J.S. (1985). Reflections on the workability of executive federalism, in R. Simeon (ed.), Intergovernmental relations, 63. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 1-32.
13. Gray, G. (1991). Federalism and health policy: The development of health systems in Canada and Australia. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
14. Immergut, E.M. (1992). The rule of the game: The logic of health policy-making in France, Switzerland, and Sweden. in S. Steinmo, K. Thelen & F. Longstreth (eds.), Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57-89.
15. Inman, R.P. & Rubinfeld, D. (1997). Rethinking federalism. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(4): 43-64.
16. Kirchgässner, G. & Pommerehne, W. (1990). Evolution of public finance as a function of federal structure: A comparison between Switzerland and the Federal Republic of Germany. Brussels: International Institute of Public Finance, 46th Congress.
17. Knott, J.H. (1981). Managing the German economy: Budgetary politics in a federal state. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
18. Laufer, H. & Münch, U. (1998). Das föderative System der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
19. Levacic, R. (1996). Economic policy, in M. Hawkesworth & M. Kogan (eds.), Encyclopedia of government and politics, Vol. 2. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 656-669.
20. Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy. New Haven, CT/London: Yale University Press.
21. Painter, M. (1991). Intergovernmental relations in Canada: An institutional analysis. Canadian Journal of Political Science 24: 269-289.
22. Perry, D.B. (1997). Financing the Canadian federation: Setting the stage for change. Canadian Tax Papers Series, Vol. 2. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.
23. Renzsch, W. (1999). Aufgabenschwerpunkte und -verschiebungen im Bund. in T. Ellwein & E. Holtmann (eds.), 50 Jahre Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Rahmenbedingungen - Entwicklungen - Perspektiven Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 363-384.
24. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1981). Does federalism matter? Political choice in a federal republic. Journal of Political Economy 89: 152-165.
25. Sally, S.R. & Webber, D. (1994). The German solidarity pact: A case study in the politics of unified Germany. German Politics 3(1): 24-26.
26. Scharpf, F.W. (1987). Sozialdemokratische Krisenpolitik in Europa. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.
27. Scharpf, F.W. (1988). The joint-decision trap: Lessons from German federalism and European integration. Public Administration 66(3): 239-278.
28. Scharpf, F.W. (1994a). Community and autonomy: Multi-level policy making in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 1(2): 219-242.
29. Scharpf, F.W. (1994b). Optionen des Föderalismus in Deutschland und Europa. Frankfurt am Main.: Campus.
30. Scharpf, F.W. (1997). Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder, CO/Oxford: Westview.
31. Schmidt, M.G. (1996). When parties matter: A review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy. European Journal of Political Research 30: 155-183.
32. Schultze, R.-O. (1990). Föderalismus als Alternative? Überlegungen zur territorialen Reorganisation von Herrschaft. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 21(3): 475-490.
33. Shapiro, E. (1978). Macroeconomic analysis, 4th edn. New York/San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
34. Sheikh, M.A. & Carreau, M. (1999). A federal perspective on the role and operation of the tax collection agreements. A paper delivered at the 1999 Tax Policy Conference, Canadian Tax Foundation, Ottawa.
35. Smiley, D.V. (1987). The federal condition in Canada. Toronto: MacGraw Hill.
36. Smiley, D.V. & Watts, R.L. (1985). Intrastate federalism in Canada, Vol. 39: The collected research studies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
37. Spahn, P.B. (1997). Intergovernmental transfers in Switzerland and Germany. in E. Ahmad (ed.), Financing decentralized expenditures: An international comparison of grants. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 103-143.
38. Spahn, P.B. & Föttinger, W. (1997). Germany. in T. Ter-Minassian (ed.), Fiscal federalism in theory and practice. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, pp. 226-248.
39. Tsebelis, G. (1995). Decision-making in political systems: Veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartysm. British Journal of Political Science 25(3): 289-325.
40. Tsebelis, G. & Money, J. (1997). Bicameralism. Cambridge/New York/Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
41. Wachendorfer-Schmidt, U. (ed.) (2000). Federalism and political performance. London: Routledge.
42. Wagschal, U. (1996). Staatsverschuldungh Ursachen im internationalen Vergleich. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
43. Weingast, B.R. (1995). The economic role of political institutions: Market-preserving federalism and economic growth. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11: 1-31.
44. Wibbels, E. (2000). Federalism and the politics of macroeconomic policy and performance. American Journal of Political Science 44(4): 687-702.
45. Zintl, R. (1992). Kooperation und Aufteilung des Kooperationsgewinns bei horizontaler Politikverflechtung. in A. Benz, F.W. Scharpf & R. Zintl (eds.), Horizontale Politkver-flechtung. Zur Theorie von Verhandlungssystemen. Frankfurt am Main: Campus, pp. 97-146.