Chemical and biological agent incident response and decision process for civilian and public sector facilities

Risk Analysis

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 195-202

  Raber, Ellen ^a   Hirabayashi, Joy M ^a   Mancieri, Saverio P ^a   Jin, Alfred L ^a   Folks, Karen J ^a   Carlsen, Tina M ^a   Estacio, Pete ^a  

^a LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological warfare agent; Chemical warfare agent; Decontamination; Decontamination decision process

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; FACILITIES; FLOWCHARTING; REMEDIATION;

WARFARE AGENTS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

CHEMICAL AGENT; TOXIN;

BIOLOGICAL WEAPON; CHEMICAL WEAPON; DECISION MAKING; DISASTER MANAGEMENT; TERRORISM;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL WARFARE; CHEMICAL WARFARE; DECISION MAKING; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH HAZARD; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PUBLIC HEALTH; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; WASTE MANAGEMENT; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; TERRORISM; UNITED STATES;

BIOTERRORISM; CHEMICAL WARFARE; DECISION MAKING; DECONTAMINATION; HUMAN; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOFTWARE DESIGN; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.; TERRORISM; UNITED STATES; HUMANS;

EID: 0035999506     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0272-4332.00026     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Decontamination issues for chemical and biological warfare agents: How clean is clean enough?