|
Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 1-3
|
Testing for endocrine disruption: How much is enough?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
DIETHYLSTILBESTROL;
ANTIESTROGEN;
XENOBIOTIC AGENT;
ANIMAL EXPERIMENT;
ANIMAL MODEL;
ANIMAL TISSUE;
ARTICLE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER;
EMBRYO;
EMBRYOTOXICITY;
ENDOCRINE DISEASE;
EXPOSURE;
FEMALE;
HISTOPATHOLOGY;
LACTATION;
NEWBORN;
NEWBORN PERIOD;
NONHUMAN;
PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT;
RAT;
RAT STRAIN;
REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY;
TOXICITY TESTING;
WEANING;
ANIMAL;
DOSE RESPONSE;
FOOD CONTAMINATION;
GOVERNMENT;
LEGAL ASPECT;
METHODOLOGY;
NOTE;
PUBLIC HEALTH;
UNITED STATES;
ANIMAL;
DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG;
ESTROGEN ANTAGONISTS;
FOOD CONTAMINATION;
PUBLIC HEALTH;
RESEARCH DESIGN;
TOXICITY TESTS;
UNITED STATES;
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY;
XENOBIOTICS;
ANIMALS;
ACRONICTA LEPORINA;
ANIMALIA;
|
EID: 0035996046
PISSN: 10966080
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/68.1.1 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (10)
|
References (11)
|