Performance of a mail-administered version of a stroke-specific outcome measure, the Stroke Impact Scale

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 493-505

  Duncan, Pamela W ^a,b   Reker, Dean M ^a,b   Horner, Ronnie D ^c,d   Samsa, Gregory P ^d   Hoenig, Helen ^c,d   Laclair, Barbara J ^e   Dudley, Tara K ^c  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c DURHAM VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e Kansas Health Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MARRIAGE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; POSTAL MAIL; RATING SCALE; STROKE; TELEPHONE; VALIDATION PROCESS; CONVALESCENCE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; STATISTICS; TIME; VALIDATION STUDY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COHORT STUDIES; DATA COLLECTION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTAL SERVICE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.; TIME FACTORS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 0035992881     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0269215502cr510oa     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change
2. Reliability and validity of a new stroke outcome scale
3. The stroke impact scale (SIS): Translations and international applications
4. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: Results from a national survey
5. Classifying function for health outcome and quality-of-life evaluation. Self- versus interviewer modes
6. A comparison of mail, telephone, and home interview strategies for household health surveys
7. Intermodal agreement of follow-up telephone functional assessment using the Functional Independence Measure in patients with stroke [published erratum appears in Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996 Jul; 77: 784]
8. Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living
9. ‘Mini-mental state’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician
10. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index
11. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients
12. Validation of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire among stroke patients
13. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients
14. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) III: Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups
15. Baseline characteristics are not sufficient indicators of nonresponse bias in follow up studies
16. Are proxy assessments of health status after stroke with the EuroQol questionnaire feasible, accurate, and unbiased?
17. Use of proxies to measure health and functional outcomes in effectiveness research in persons with Alzheimer disease and related disorders
18. Measurement in neurological rehabilitation
19. Test-retest performance of a mailed version of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey among older adults
20. Is the SF-36 suitable for assessing health status of older stroke patients?