|
Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 169-178
|
Comparing and contrasting methods for tenodesis of the ruptured distal biceps tendon
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
BICEPS BRACHII MUSCLE;
HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
REVIEW;
SURGICAL APPROACH;
SURGICAL RISK;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
SYNOSTOSIS;
TENDON RECONSTRUCTION;
TENDON RUPTURE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
ELBOW;
HISTOLOGY;
INJURY;
METHODOLOGY;
ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY;
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;
PHYSIOLOGY;
RUPTURE;
TENDON;
TENDON INJURY;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
ELBOW JOINT;
HUMAN;
ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES;
RUPTURE;
TENDON INJURIES;
TENDONS, PARA-ARTICULAR;
HUMANS;
TENDONS;
|
EID: 0035992764
PISSN: 07490712
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0749-0712(02)00009-4 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (26)
|
References (40)
|