|
Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 918-929
|
Comparison of the clinical efficacy and tolerability of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and loteprednol etabonate 0.2% ophthalmic suspension in the conjunctival allergen challenge model
a a a |
Author keywords
Conjunctival allergen challenge; Loteprednol; Ocular allergy; Olopatadine
|
Indexed keywords
ANDROSTANE DERIVATIVE;
ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT;
DIBENZOXEPIN DERIVATIVE;
EYE DROPS;
LOTEPREDNOL ETABONATE;
OLOPATADINE;
ALLERGEN;
ANTIALLERGIC AGENT;
NAPHAZOLINE;
PLACEBO;
ADULT;
AGED;
ALLERGIC CONJUNCTIVITIS;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE;
DRUG EFFECT;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
VISUAL ACUITY;
ALLERGIC REACTION;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
DRUG EFFICACY;
DRUG TOLERABILITY;
EVALUATION;
MEASUREMENT;
PRURITUS;
RAGWEED POLLEN;
RATING SCALE;
SCORING SYSTEM;
STANDARDIZATION;
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;
SYMPTOM;
ADULT;
AGED;
ANDROSTADIENES;
ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AGENTS;
CONJUNCTIVITIS, ALLERGIC;
DIBENZOXEPINS;
DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
OPHTHALMIC SOLUTIONS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
VISUAL ACUITY;
|
EID: 0035986660
PISSN: 01492918
EISSN: 1879114X
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0149-2918(02)80007-8 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (46)
|
References (36)
|