Better bootstrap estimation of hazardous concentration thresholds for aquatic assemblages

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 1515-1524

  Grist, Eric P M ^a   Leung, Kenneth M Y ^b   Wheeler, James R ^a   Crane, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Bootstrap regression; Risk assessment; Species sensitivity distribution

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

BOOTSTRAP ESTIMATION;

TOXICITY;

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM; BOOTSTRAPPING; POLLUTION; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TECHNIQUE; DANGEROUS GOODS; DRUG SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; STATISTICS; WATER POLLUTION;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; NO-OBSERVED-ADVERSE-EFFECT LEVEL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTIONS; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T; WATER POLLUTION, CHEMICAL;

EID: 0035985210     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620210725     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Report of the OECD Workshop on the extrapolation of laboratory aquatic toxicity data to the real environment
2. A safety factor for LC50 values allowing for differences in sensitivity among species
3. Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data
4. Ecotoxicological evaluation of soil quality criteria
5. Estimation of ecotoxicological protection levels from NOEC toxicity data
6. Probabilistic risk assessment of agrochemicals in the environment
7. A probabilistic ecological risk assessment of tributyltin in surface waters of the Chesapeake Bay watershed
8. Standards for environmental protection
9. Variability: Noise or information in ecotoxicology?
10. Derivation of acceptable concentrations for the protection of aquatic organisms
11. A critique of the use of distribution-based extrapolation models in ecotoxicology
12. Ecological implications of '95% protection levels' for metals in soil
13. Fallacies in ecological risk assessment practices
14. Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions
15. Applying species-sensitivity distributions in ecological risk assessment: Assumptions of distribution type and sufficient numbers of species
16. Bootstrap estimation of community NOEC values
17. Guidance document for aquatic effects assessment
18. Report of the OECD Workshop on the extrapolation of laboratory aquatic toxicity data to the real environment
19. Estimating low toxic effects
20. Uncertainty in toxicological predictions: The Bayesian approach to statistics
21. Resampling fewer than n observations: Gains, losses, and remedies for losses
22. The bootstrap: A tutorial
23. An Edgeworth expansion for the m out of n bootstrapped median
24. Comments on species sensitivity distributions sample size determination based on Newman et al. (2000) determining optimal size according to Newman et al. (2000)
25. The bootstrap: To smooth or not to smooth?
26. Can saltwater toxicity be predicted from freshwater data?
27. Species sensitivity distributions: Data and model choice
28. Bootstrapping a regression equation: Some empirical results
29. Pros and cons of species sensitivity distribution approaches in the risk assessment of potential toxicants in the environment
30. Estimating inhibition concentrations for different response scales using generalized linear models
31. Modeling dose response using generalized linear models