Parallel transport in an entangled ring

Journal of Mathematical Physics

Volumn 43, Issue 9, 2002, Pages 4307-4325

  Wootters, William K ^a  

^a WILLIAMS COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035981720     PISSN: 00222488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1499207     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. F. Wilczek and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 2111 (1984).
2. For a guide to the literature, see J. Anandan, J. Christian, and K. Walenik, Am. J. Phys. 65, 180 (1997).
3. M.V. Berry, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 392, 45 (1984).
4. Y. Aharonov and J.S. Anandan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1593 (1987).
5. C.M. Caves, C.A. Fuchs, and P. Rungta, Found. Phys. Lett. 14, 199 (2001).
6. D. Bruß, Phys. Rev. A 60, 4344 (1999).
7. V. Coffman, J. Kundu, and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 61, 052306 (2000).
8. M. Koashi, V. Bužek, and N. Imoto, Phys. Rev. A 62, 050302 (2000).
9. W. Dür, G. Vidal, and J.I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A 62, 062314 (2000).
10. Kenneth A. Dennison and William K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 65, 010301 (2001).
11. K.M. O'Connor and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 63, 052302 (2001).
12. C.H. Bennett, D.P. DiVincenzo, J. Smolin, and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824 (1996).
13. C.H. Bennett, G. Brassard, S. Popescu, B. Schumacher, J. Smolin, and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 722 (1996).
14. T.J. Osborne and M.A. Nielsen, quant-ph/0109024.
15. J. Preskill, J. Mod. Opt. 47, 127 (2000).
16. P. Zanardi and X. Wang, quant-ph/0201028.
17. T.J. Osborne and M.A. Nielsen, quant-ph/0202162.
18. F. Berruto, G. Grignani, G.W. Semenoff, and P. Sodano, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 275, 254 (1999).
19. For an introduction, see G. Münster and M. Walzl, hep-lat/0012005.
20. K.G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2445 (1974).
21. E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 16, 407 (1961).
22. T. Kennedy, E.H. Lieb, and B.S. Shastry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2582 (1988).
23. K. Kubo and T. Kishi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2585 (1988).
24. C.J. Hamer, T. Hövelborn, and M. Bachhuber, J. Phys. A 32, 51 (1999).
25. S. Zhang and K.J. Runge, Phys. Rev. B 45, 1052 (1992).
26. A.W. Sandvik and C.J. Hamer, Phys. Rev. B 60, 6588 (1999).
27. F. Verstraete and H. Verschelde, in quant-ph/0203073, have elucidated the relationship between the fully entangled fraction f of a pair of qubits and the entanglement as measured by the concurrence.
28. (jk) = (|↑↓〉〈↑↓| + |↑↓〉〈↑↓|)/2, then any rotation around the z axis maximizes F(R), and yet the correlation (4f-1)/3 has the value 1/3. However, as in the case of rebits, this sort of ambiguity does not cause any difficulties for the problem we are considering.
29. Werner states are discussed, for example, in K.G.H. Vollbrecht and R.F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 64, 062307 (2001).