Estimating prevalence when the true disease status is incompletely ascertained

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 935-949

  Sasieni, Peter ^a  

^a IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALZHEIMER DISEASE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; PATIENT REFERRAL; PHYSICAL DISEASE; PREVALENCE; RANDOMIZATION; SAMPLE; SCREENING TEST; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;

AGED; ALZHEIMER DISEASE; BIOPSY; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CERVIX UTERI; DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; PAPILLOMAVIRIDAE; PREVALENCE; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 0035970728     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.907     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Estimating the error rates of diagnostic tests
2. The effect of conditional dependence on the evaluation of diagnostic tests
3. Log-linear models for doubly sampled categorical data fitted by the EM algorithm
4. Evaluating multiple diagnostic tests with partial verification
5. Comparing accuracies of two screening tests in a two-phase study for dementia
6. Inference and missing data
7. Human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening
8. Visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening: Test qualities in a primary-care setting
9. A cross-cultural community based study of dementias: Methods and performance of survey instrument
10. The partial testing design: A less costly way to test equivalence for sensitivity and specificity
11. The importance of work-up (verification) bias correction in assessing the accuracy of SPECT Thallium-201 testing for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease
12. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm
13. Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias