Femtochemistry of the hydrated electron at decimolar concentration

Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Volumn 105, Issue 51, 2001, Pages 11400-11406

  Pommeret, S ^a,c   Gobert, F ^a,b   Mostafavi, M ^b   Lampre, I ^b   Mialocq, J C ^a  

^a CEA SACLAY   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

^c ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRON ABSORPTION; HIGH POWER LASERS; HYDRATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PHOTOIONIZATION; PHOTONS; PUMPING (LASER); QUANTUM THEORY;

FEMTOSECOND LASERS;

RADIATION CHEMISTRY;

EID: 0035961101     PISSN: 10895639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp0123381     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Hart, E. J.; Anbar, M. The Hydrated Electron; Wiley Interscience: New York, 1970.
2. Tabata, Y.; Ito, Y.; Tagawa, S. Handbook of Radiation Chemistry; CRC Press: Boston, 1991.
3. Mozumder, A. Fundamentals of Radiation Chemistry; Academic Press: New York, 1999.
4. Bronskill, M. J.; Wolff, R. K.; Hunt, J. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1969, 73, 1175.
5. Jonah, C. D.; Matheson, M. S.; Miller, J. R.; Hart, E. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1976, 80, 1267.
6. Nikogosyan, D. N.; Oraevsky, A. A.; Rupasov, V. I. Chem. Phys. 1983, 77, 131.
7. Migus, A.; Gauduel, Y.; Martin, J. L.; Antonetti, A. Phys. Rev. Lett 1987, 58, 1559.
8. Crowell, R. A.; Bartels, D. M. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 17940.
9. Thomsen, C. L.; Madsen, D.; Keiding, S. R.; Thogersen, J.; Christiansen, O. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 3453.
10. Michael, B. D.; Hart, E. J.; Schmidt, K. H. J. Phys. Chem. 1971, 75, 2798.
11. Jou, F.-Y.; Freeman, G. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1979, 83, 2383.
12. Gauduel, Y.; Pommeret, S.; Migus, A.; Antonetti, A. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 93, 3880.
13. Reuther, A.; Laubereau, A.; Nikogosyan, D. N. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 16794.
14. Buxton, G. V.; Greenstock, C. L.; Helman, W. P.; Ross, A. B. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1988, 17, 513.
15. Pimblott, S. M. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 6946.
16. Goulet, T.; Jay-Gerin, J. P. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 96, 5076.
17. The Notre Dame Radiation Laboratory Radiation Chemistry Data Center (http://allen.rad.nd.edu) provides a large set of references on radiation chemistry reaction rates.
18. Gauduel, Y.; Pommeret, S.; Migus, A.; Yamada, N.; Antonetti, A. J. Opt. Soc. Am., B 1990, 7, 1528.
19. Aldrich, J. E.; Bronskill, M. J.; Wolf, R. K.; Hunt J. W. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 55, 530.
20. Duplâtre, G.; Jonah, C. D. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1985, 24, 57.
21. Wolff, R. K.; Bronskill, M. J.; Hunt, J. W. J. Chem. Phys. 1975, 7, 317.
22. Pimblott, S. M.; LaVerne, J. A. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 2967.
23. Gobert, F.; Pommeret, S.; Vigneron, G.; Buguet, S.; Haidar, R.; Mialocq, J.-C.; Lampre, I.; Mostafavi, M. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2001, 27, 901.
24. Pommeret, S.; Gobert, F.; Mostafavi, M.; Lampre, I.; Pernot, P.; Haidar, R.; Buguet, S.; Vigneron, G.; Mialocq, J.-C. In Ultrafast Phenomena XII; Elsaesser, T., Mukamel, S., Murnane, M. M., Scherer, N. F., Eds.; Springer Series in Chemical Physics; Springer: New York, 2000; Vol. 66, p 536.
25. Pommeret, S.; Naskrecki, R.; van der Meulen, P.; Ménard, M.; Vigneron, G.; Gustavsson, T. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 288, 833.
26. Naskrecki, R.; Ménard, M.; van der Meulen, P.; Vigneron, G.; Pommeret, S. Opt. Comm. 1998, 153, 32.
27. Fournier, T.; Pommeret, S.; Mialocq, J.-C.; Deflandre, A.; Rozot, R. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000, 325, 171.
28. Mialocq, J.-C.; Sutton, J.; Goujon, P. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 6338.
29. Lam, K. Y.; Hunt, J. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1975, 79, 317.
30. Jonah, C. D.; Miller, J. R.; Matheson, M. S. J. Phys. Chem. 1977, 81, 931.
31. Gauduel, Y.; Pommeret, S.; Migus, A.; Yamada, N.; Antonetti, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 2925.
32. Pastina, B.; LaVerne, J. A.; Pimblott, S. M. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 5841.
33. Kee, T. W.; Hee Son, D.; Kambhampati, P.; Barbara, P. F. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 8434.
34. Shen, Y. R. The Principle of Nonlinear Optics; Wiley: New York, 1984.
35. Sutherland, R. L. Handbook of Nonlinear Optics; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1996.
36. The fitted value of R is quite large compare to the calculated value with the refractive indexes (0.03). This discrepancy is due to the surface roughness of the jet that induces additional diffusion.
37. Selden, A. C. Science 1971, 229, 210.
38. Keelly, P. J.; Jones, S. C.; Shen, X. A.; Simpson, L.; Braunlich, P. F.; Casper, R. T. Phys. Rev. B 1990, 42, 11370.
39. Catalano, I. M.; Cingolani, A. Solid State Commun. 1984, 52, 539.
40. Catalano, I. M.; Cingolani, A. J. Appl. Phys. 1978, 50, 5638.
41. Bartels, D. M.; Crowell, R. A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 3349.
42. As pointed out in ref 41, it is important to define the quantum yield in terms of hydrated electron produce per one photon. This definition is used throughout the present paper. In ref 41, the authors used the quantum efficiency rather than the quantum yield. Consequently, their values of quantum efficiency at 266 nm should be divided by two to be compared with our value and those of ref 6.
43. •.
44. Tsuboi, Y.; Hatanaka, K.; Fukumara H.; Masuhara, H. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 1661.