Diagnostic value of prenatal MRI in the foetus with intracranial anomalies established by ultrasonography;Diagnostische bijdrage van antenatale MRI bij de foetus met echografisch vastgestelde intracraniële afwijkingen

Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

Volumn 145, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 179-184

  Gerards, F A ^a   Stoutenbeek, Ph ^a   Gooskens, R H J M ^a   Beek, F J A ^a   Groenendaal, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN; BRAIN DISEASE; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FETUS DISEASE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

BRAIN; BRAIN DISEASES; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; FETAL DISEASES; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 0035956786     PISSN: 00282162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Quinn TM, Hubbard AM, Adzick NS. Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging enhances fetal diagnosis. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:553-8.
2. Vimercati A, Greco P, Vera L, Resta M, Selvaggi L. The diagnostic role of 'in utero' magnetic resonance imaging. J Perinat Med 1999; 27:303-8.
3. Resta M, Greco P, D'Addario V, Florio C, Dardes N, Caruso G, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy: study of fetal cerebral malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994;4:7-20.
4. Garel C, Brisse H, Sebag G, Elmaleh M, Oury JF, Hassan M. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetus. Pediatr Radiol 1998;28:201-11.
5. Monteagudo AM, Reuss ML, Timor-Tritsch IE. Imaging the fetal brain in the second and third trimesters using transvaginal sonography. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:27-32.
6. Wolff S, James TL, Young GB, Margulis AR, Bodycote J. Afzal V. Magnetic resonance imaging: absence of in vitro cytogenetic damage. Radiology 1985;155:163-5.
7. Barkovic AJ. Pediatric neuroimaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: 1999, p. 14-28.
8. Kanal E, Shellock FG, Talagala L. Safety considerations in MR imaging. Radiology 1990;176:593-606.
9. Sonigo PC, Rypens FF, Carteret M, Delezoide AL, Brunelle FO. MR imaging of fetal cerebral anomalies. Pediatr Radiol 1998;28:212-22.
10. D'Ercole C, Girard N. Cravello L, Boubli L, Potier A, Raybaud C, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal corpus callosum. Agenesis by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Prenat Diagn 1998;18: 247-53.
11. Revel MP, Pons JC, Lelaidier C, Fournet P, Vial M, Musset D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetus: a study of 20 cases performed without curarization. Prenat Diagn 1993;13:775-99.
12. Battin MR, Maalouf EF, Counsell SJ, Herlihy AH, Rutherford MA, Azzopardi D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in very preterm infants: visualization of the germinal matrix, early myelination, and cortical folding. Pediatrics 1998;101:957-62.
13. The National Radiological Protection Board ad hoc Advisory Group on Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Clinical Imaging. Revised guidance on acceptable limits of exposure during nuclear magnetic resonance clinical imaging. Br J Radiol 1983;56:974-7.
14. Forstner R, Kalbhen CL, Filly RA, Hricak H. Abdominopelvic MR imaging in the nonobstetric evaluation of pregnant patients. Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:1139-44.
15. Baker PN; Johnson IR, Harvey PR, Gowland PA, Mansfield P. A three-year follow-up of children imaged in utero with echoplanar magnetic resonance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170(1 Pt 1):32-3.
16. Shellock FG, Crues JV. Temperature, heart rate, and blood pressure changes associated with clinical MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1987;163:259-62.