Comparison of 2 methods for calculating adjusted survival curves from proportional hazards models

JAMA

Volumn 286, Issue 12, 2001, Pages 1494-1497

  Ghali, William A ^a   Quan, Hude ^a   Brant, Rollin ^a   Van Melle, Guy ^c   Norris, Colleen M ^b   Faris, Peter D ^a   Galbraith, P Diane ^a   Knudtson, Merril L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0035955045     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.286.12.1494     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Adjusting survival curves for confounders: A review and a new method
2. Covariance adjustment of survival curves based on Cox's proportional hazards regression model
3. Adjusted survival curve estimation using covariates
4. Corrected group prognostic curves and summary statistics
5. Use of a prognostic index in evaluation of liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis
6. Does the survival advantage of non-white dialysis patients persist after case mix adjustment?
7. How much better can we predict dialysis patient survival using clinical data?
8. Perioperative blood transfusion and postoperative mortality
9. Long-term survival among men with conservatively treated localized prostate cancer
10. Low risk-factor profile and long-term cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality and life expectancy
11. Serum total cholesterol and long-term coronary heart disease mortality in different cultures
12. Prognostic significance of diabetes as a predictor of survival after cardiac catheterization
13. Overview of APPROACH - The Alberta Provincial Program for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease