Users' experiences with modern hearing aids: An audit;Brugernes erfaringer med moderne høreapparater: En audit

Ugeskrift for Laeger

Volumn 163, Issue 13, 2001, Pages 1857-1862

  Parving, Agnete ^a   Sibelle, Philip ^b  

^a BISPEBJERG HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENMARK; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL AUDIT; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STANDARD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; DENMARK; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING IMPAIRED PERSONS; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL AUDIT; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRES; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 0035953245     PISSN: 00415782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Davis AC. The prevalence of hearing impairment and reported hearing disability among adults in Great Britain. Int J Epidemiol 1989; 18: 911-7.
2. Parving A, Biering-Sørensen M, Bech B, Christensen B, Sørensen MS. Hearing in the elderly >80 years of age - prevalence of problems and sensitivity. Scand Audiol 1997; 26: 99-106.
3. Rosenhall U, Jónsson R, Davis A, Parving A. Hearing in the »oldest old« -a cross-sectional collaborative study from three European countries. J Audiol Med 2000; 9: 43-52.
4. Arlinger S, Billennark E, Öberg ML, Lunner T, Hellgren J. Clinical trial of a digital hearing aid. Scand Audiol 1998; 27: 51-61.
5. Bille M, Jensen AM, Kjaerbol E, Vesterager V, Sibelle P, Nielsen H. Clinical study of a digital vs an analogue hearing aid. Scand Audiol 1999; 28: 127-35.
6. Parving A, Sørenser MS, Carver K, Christensen B, Sibelle P, Vesterager V. Hearing instruments and health technology - an evaluation. Scand Audiol 1997; 26: 231-9.
7. Nilsson P, Vesterager V, Sibelle P, Sieck L, Christensen B. A double-blind cross-over study of a non-linear hearing aid. Audiology 1997; 36: 325-38.
8. Parving A. The value of speech audiometry in hearing-aid rehabilitation. Scand Audiol 1991; 20: 159-64.
9. Parving A, Clement F. Høreundersøgelser i speciallægepraksis. Ugeskr Læger 1999; 161: 6496-500.
10. Arlinger S. Clinical assessment of modern hearing aids. Scand Audiol Suppl 1998; 49: 50-3.
11. Valente M, Fabry DA, Potts LG. Recognition of speech in noise with hearing aids using dual microphones. J Am Acad Audiol 1995; 6: 440-9.
12. Gravel JS, Fausel N, Liskow C, Chobot J. Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology. Ear Hear 1999; 20: 1-11.
13. Sibelle P, Parving A. An audit of hearing aid quality in Denmark. II: type of defects. Br J Audiol 1994; 28: 141-8.
14. Parving A, Sibelle P. An audit of hearing rehabilitation within the health service - past and present. Scand Audiol 1995; 24: 33-8.
15. Peters RW, Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR, Stone MA. Comparison of the NAL(R) and Cambridge formulae for the fitting of linear hearing aids. Br J Audiol 2000; 34: 21-36.
16. Biering-Sørensen M, Riess H, Boisen G, Parving A. A clinical comparative investigation of a non-linear versus linear hearing aid. Scand Audiol 1995; 24: 125-32.
17. Plomp R. Noise, amplification and compression: considerations of three main issues in hearing aid design. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 2-12.
18. Moore BCJ. Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearings aids. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 133-60.
19. McCombe A. The hearing aid revolution. ENT News 2000; 8: 13.
20. Parving A, Salomon G. Audiology in Denmark. I: Pedersen CB; Bonding P, eds. Otolaryngology in Denmark 1899-1999. Dansk Selskab for Otolaryngologi, Hoved-og Halskirurgi, 1999: 115-23.