A PMF-based subspace method for continuous-time model identification. Application to a multivariable winding process

International Journal of Control

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 118-132

  Bastogne, Thierry ^a   Garnier, H ^a   Sibille, P ^a  

^a CENTRE DE RECHERCHE EN AUTOMATIQUE DE NANCY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); INTEGRAL EQUATIONS; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STATE SPACE METHODS; WINDING;

CONTINUOUS-TIME MODELS;

MULTIVARIABLE SYSTEMS;

EID: 0035916056     PISSN: 00207179     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207170150203471     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aström, K.J., Hagander, P., and Sternby, J., 1984, Zeros of sampled systems. Automatica, 20, 31-38.
2. Bastogne, T., Garnier, H., Sibille, P., and Mensler, M., 1997, PMF-based subspace method for continuous-time model identification. Deterministic study. In Proceedings of the 11th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Kitakyushu, Japan, volume 4, pp. 1665-1670.
3. Bastogne, T., Noura, H., Sibille, P., and Richard, A., 1998, Multivariable identification of a winding process by subspace methods for tension control. Control Engineering Practice, 6, 1077-1088.
4. Bastogne, T., and Sibille, P., 1998, Identification of the input dependent dynamics of winding tensions. In Proceedings of the IFAC Conference on System Structure and Control, Nantes, France, volume 2, pages 255-260.
5. Bingulac, S., and Cooper, D.S., 1991, Use of pseudo-observability indices in identification of continuous-time multivariable models. In N.K. Sinha and G.P. Rao (Eds) Identification of Continuous-time Systems-Methodology and Computer Implementation (Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 443-471.
6. Chou, C., and Verhaegen, M., 1999, Closed-loop identification using canonical correlation analysis. In Proceedings of the 5th European Control Conference, Karlsruhe, Germany.
7. Dahlén, A., Lindquist, A., and Mari, J., 1998, Experimental evidence showing that stochastic subspace identification methods fail. System and Control Letters, 34, 303-312.
8. De Moor, B., and Van Overschee, P., 1995, Numerical algorithms for subspace state space system identification. In A. Isidori (Ed.) Trends in Control, A European Perspective (London: Springer), pp. 385-422.
9. Edmunds, J.M., 1985, Identifying sampled data systems using difference operator models. Control Center Report 601, UMIST, Manchester, UK.
10. Garnier, H., Gilson, M., and Zheng, W.X., 2000, A bias-eliminated least-squares method for continuous-time model identification of closed-loop system. International Journal of Control, 73, 38-48.
11. Garnier, H., and Mensler, M., 1999, CONTSID - A CONtinuous-Time System IDentification toolbox for Matlab. In 5th European Control Conference, Karlsruhe, Germany.
12. Garnier, H., Sibille, P., and Bastogne, T., 1997, A bias free least-squares parameter estimator for continuous-time state-space models. In Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, USA, pp. 1860-1865.
13. Garnier, H., Sibille, P., and Spott, T., 1994, Influence of the initial covariance matrix on recursive LS estimation of continuous models via generalized Poisson moment functionals. In Proceedings of 10th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Copenhagen, Denmark, volume 3, pp. 669-674.
14. Gawthrop, P.J., 1987, Continuous-time Self Tuning Control. Vol. 1: Design (New York: Wiley).
15. Golub, G.H., and Van Loan, C.F., 1993, Matrix Computations (Baltimore, Maryland, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press).
16. Homssi, L., Titli, A., and Despujols, A., 1991, Continuous-time process identification: comparison of eight methods and particular aspects. In Proceedings of the 9th IFAC/ IFORS Symposium on Identification and System Parameter Estimation, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 1634-1642.
17. Isermann, R., 1992, Estimation of physical parameters for dynamic processes with application to an industrial robot. International Journal of Control, 55, 1287-1298.
18. Johansson, R., Verhaegen, M., and Chou, C.T., 1999, Stochastic theory of continuous-time state-space identification. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 47, 41-51.
19. Larimore, W.E., 1983, System identification, reduced-order filtering and modelling via canonical variate analysis. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, New York, USA, pp. 445-451.
20. Ljung, L., 1987, System Identification: Theory for the User (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).
21. Ljung, L., 1997, Developments for the system identification toolbox for Matlab. In Proceedings of the 11th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Kitakyushu, Japan, volume 2, pages 969-973.
22. Mensler, M., Garnier, H., Richard, A., and Sibille, P., 1999, Comparison of sixteen continuous-time identification methods with the CONTSID toolbox. In 5th European Control Conference, Karlsruhe, Germany.
23. Moonen, M., De Moor, B., and Vandewalle, J., 1991, SVD-based subspace methods for multivariable continuous-time systems identification. In N.K. Sinha and G.P. Rao (Eds) Identification of Continuous-time Systems, Methodology and Computer Implementation (Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 473-488.
24. Moonen, M., and Vandewalle, J., 1990, QSVD approach to on- and off-line state-space identification. International Journal of Control, 51, 1133-1146.
25. Ohsumi, A., Kameyama, K., and Yamaguchi, K.-I., 1999, Subspace-based identification for continuous-time stochastic systems via distribution-theoretic approach. In Proceedings of the 14th IFAC World Congress, Beijing, P.R. China. Paper No. H-3a-07-3, pp. 223 228.
26. Peter, K., and Isermann, R., 1989, Parameter-adaptive PID control based on continuous-time process models. In Symposium on Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, Glasgow, Scotland, pp. 495-500.
27. Saha, D.C., and Rao, G.P., 1983, Identification of Continuous Dynamical Systems. The Poisson Moment Functional (PMF) Approach. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences (Springer-Verlag).
28. Schoukens, J., Pintelon, R., and Hammer, H.V., 1994, Identification of linear dynamic systems using piecewise constant excitations: use, misuse and alternatives. Automatica, 30, 1153-1169.
29. Sinha, N.K., and Rao, G.P., 1991, Identification of Continuous-time Systems - Methodology and Computer Implementation (The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
30. Unbehauen, H., and Rao, G.P., 1987, Identification of Continuous Systems (Amsterdam: North-Holland Systems and Control Series).
31. Unbehauen, H., and Rao, G.P., 1990, Continuous-time approaches to system identification-a survey. Automatica, 26, 23-35.
32. Van Ovserschee, P., and De Moor, B., 1994, N4SID: Subspace algorithms for the identification of combined deterministic-stochastic systems. Automatica, 30, 75-93.
33. Van Overschee, P., and De Moor, B., 1996a, Continuous-time frequency domain subspace system identification. Signal Processing, Special Issue on Subspace Methods, Part II: System Identification, 52, 179-194.
34. Van Overschee, P., and De Moor, B., 1996b, Subspace Identification for Linear Systems-Theory, Implementation, Applications (Kluwer Academic Publishers).
35. Verhaegen, M., 1991, A novel non-iterative MIMO state-space model identification technique. In Proceedings of the 9th IFAC/IFORS Symposium an Identification and System Parameter Estimation, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 1453-1458.
36. Verhaegen, M., 1994, Identification of the deterministic part of the MIMO state space models given in innovations form from input-output data. Automatica, 30, 61-74. Special Issue on Statistical Signal Processing and Control.
37. Viberg, M., 1994, Subspace methods in system identification. In Proceedings of the 10th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Copenhagen, Denmark, volume 1, pp. 1-12.
38. Viberg, M., Ottersten, B., Wahlberg, B., and Ljung, L., 1993, Performance of Subspace-Based System Identification Methods. Proceedings of the 12th IFAC World Congress, 7, 369-372, Sydney, Australia.
39. Young, P.C., 1964, Discussion on 'in-flight dynamic checkout'. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace, AS-2, 1106-1111.
40. Young, P.C., 1965, The determination of the parameters of a dynamic process. The Radio and Electronic Engineer (Journal of IERE), 29, 345-361.
41. Young, P.C., 1970, An instrumental variable method for realtime identification of a noisy process. Automatica, 6, 271-287.
42. Young, P.C., 1981, Parameter estimation for continuous-time models-a survey. Automatica, 17, 23-39.
43. Young, P.C., 1996, Identification, estimation and control of continuous-time and delta operator systems. In M. Friswell and J. Mottershead (Eds) Identification in Engineering Systems, University of Wales, Swansea, pp. 1-17.
44. Young, P.C., and Jakeman, A.J., 1980, Refined instrumental variable methods of recursive time-series analysis. Part 3: extensions. International Journal of Control, 31, 741-764.