Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests: Odds ratio is not independent of prevalence [10]

British Medical Journal

Volumn 323, Issue 7322, 2001, Pages 1188-

  Blackman, N J M ^a   Ter Riet, G ^a   Kessels, A G H ^a   Bachmann, L M ^a  

^a GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EVALUATION; HUMAN; LETTER; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; META ANALYSIS; NOTE; PREVALENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; PREVALENCE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS;

EID: 0035904602     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (0)