-
1
-
-
0002004726
-
-
Metal-Insulator Transitions, 2nd ed. (Taylor & Francis, London, 1990)
-
N. F. Mott, Proc. Phys. Soc. London, Sect. B 62, 416 (1949);Metal-Insulator Transitions, 2nd ed. (Taylor & Francis, London, 1990).
-
(1949)
Proc. Phys. Soc. London, Sect. B
, vol.62
, pp. 416
-
-
Mott, N.F.1
-
2
-
-
85038316637
-
-
F. Gebhard, The Mott Metal-Insulator Transition, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics Vol. 137 (Springer, Berlin, 1997)
-
F. Gebhard, The Mott Metal-Insulator Transition, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics Vol. 137 (Springer, Berlin, 1997).
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
0030528685
-
-
A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 13 (1996).
-
(1996)
Rev. Mod. Phys.
, vol.68
, pp. 13
-
-
Georges, A.1
Kotliar, G.2
Krauth, W.3
Rozenberg, M.J.4
-
15
-
-
0000963720
-
-
G. Moeller, Q. Si, G. Kotliar, M. Rozenberg, and D. S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2082 (1995).
-
(1995)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.74
, pp. 2082
-
-
Moeller, G.1
Si, Q.2
Kotliar, G.3
Rozenberg, M.4
Fisher, D.S.5
-
18
-
-
85038292409
-
-
Although an insulator is only strictly defined for (Formula presented), we use the term insulating or insulating-like to denote the solution with vanishingly small spectral weight at the Fermi level for (Formula presented)
-
Although an insulator is only strictly defined for (Formula presented), we use the term insulating or insulating-like to denote the solution with vanishingly small spectral weight at the Fermi level for (Formula presented).
-
-
-
-
20
-
-
0000773196
-
-
M. J. Rozenberg, G. Kotliar, H. Kajueter, G. A. Thomas, D. H. Rapkine, J. M. Honig, and P. Metcalf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 105 (1995).
-
(1995)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.75
, pp. 105
-
-
Rozenberg, M.J.1
Kotliar, G.2
Kajueter, H.3
Thomas, G.A.4
Rapkine, D.H.5
Honig, J.M.6
Metcalf, P.7
-
21
-
-
85038331702
-
-
As to be discussed in the following, the MIT at (Formula presented) is of second order only in the sense that at the transition point, (Formula presented) is continuous and (Formula presented) is not. It is special and should be distinct from the conventional second-order transition
-
As to be discussed in the following, the MIT at (Formula presented) is of second order only in the sense that at the transition point, (Formula presented) is continuous and (Formula presented) is not. It is special and should be distinct from the conventional second-order transition.
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
3442877725
-
-
C. Castellani, C. Di Castro, D. Feinberg, and J. Ranninger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1957 (1979).
-
(1979)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.43
, pp. 1957
-
-
Castellani, C.1
Di Castro, C.2
Feinberg, D.3
Ranninger, J.4
-
24
-
-
85038274199
-
-
Part of the programs provided by Ref. 6 were adapted for our use
-
Part of the programs provided by Ref. 6 were adapted for our use.
-
-
-
|