Crossover from marginal Fermi liquid to Luttinger liquid behavior in carbon nanotubes

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 64, Issue 20, 2001, Pages

  Bellucci, S ^a   Gonzalez J ^b  

^a INFN LABORATORI NAZIONALI DI FRASCATI   (Italy)

^b INSTITUTO DE ESTRUCTURA DE LA MATERIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON; GRAPHITE;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; LIQUID; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PHENOMENOLOGY; POLARIZATION;

EID: 0035890925     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.201106     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. J. Gan and E. Wong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4226 (1993);
2. C. Nayak and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B 417, 359 (1994);
3. S. Chakravarty, R.E. Norton, and O.F. Syljuasen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1423 (1995);
4. J. González, F. Guinea, and M.A.H. Vozmediano, Nucl. Phys. B 485, 694 (1997).
5. J. Sólyom, Adv. Phys. 28, 201 (1979).
6. F.D.M. Haldane, J. Phys. C 14, 2585 (1981).
7. P.W. Anderson, The Theory of Superconductivity in the High-(Formula presented) Cuprates (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1997).
8. C. Castellani, C. Di Castro, and W. Metzner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 316 (1994).
9. This result is reinforced by the fact that the coupling of Luttinger liquids by the slightest hopping in the transverse direction leads also to Fermi liquid behavior of the system, as shown by X.G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 42, 6623 (1990);
10. E. Arrigoni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 128 (1999).
11. P.-A. Bares and X.G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 48, 8636 (1993);
12. A. Houghton, H.-J. Kwon, J.B. Marston, and R. Shankar, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 6, 4909 (1994);
13. C. Castellani, C. Di Castro, and A. Maccarone, Phys. Rev. B 55, 2676 (1997).
14. S. Yu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 483 (1996).
15. J. González, F. Guinea, and M.A.H. Vozmediano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3589 (1996).
16. J. González, F. Guinea, and M.A.H. Vozmediano, Phys. Rev. B 59, R2474 (1999).
17. A. Bachtold, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 166801 (2001).
18. M. Bockrath et al., Nature (London) 397, 598 (1999).
19. Z. Yao et al., Nature (London) 402, 273 (1999).
20. See also R. Egger and A. O. Gogolin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 066401 (2001).
21. J. González, F. Guinea, and M.A.H. Vozmediano, Nucl. Phys. B 406, 771 (1993).
22. L. Balents and M.P.A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 55, R11 973 (1997).
23. R. Egger and A.O. Gogolin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 5082 (1997);
24. R. EggerA.O. GogolinEur. Phys. J. B 3, 281 (1998).
25. J. González, F. Guinea, and M.A.H. Vozmediano, Phys. Rev. B 63, 134421 (2001).
26. D.V. Khveshchenko, report cond-mat/0101306.
27. R. Shankar, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 129 (1994).
28. On phenomenological grounds, one can however make sense of such dependence on the transverse dimension, which leads to scale-dependent critical exponents as reported by C. Kane, L. Balents, and M.P.A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 5086 (1997);
29. S. Bellucci and J. González, Eur. Phys. J. B 18, 3 (2000);
30. D. W. Wang, A. J. Millis, and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B 64, 193307 (2001).
31. P. Kopietz, J. Hermisson, and K. Schönhammer, Phys. Rev. B 52, 10 877 (1995);
32. W. Metzner, C. Castellani, and C. Di Castro, Adv. Phys. 47, 317 (1998).
33. C. Itzykson and B. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980).
34. R. Egger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5547 (1999).