Mediating denials of pharmaceutical services: An alternative to traditional appeals

American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy

Volumn 58, Issue 22, 2001, Pages 2147-2150

  Bess, D Todd ^a,b,c   Blackford, Jennifer ^d   Regan, Judith J ^e,f,g,h   Alderson, Ann ^e  

^a Tennessee Mental Health Consumers Association   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e TDMHDD ^*

^f VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^h Department of Pharmacy Practice

Author keywords

Administration; Communication; Costs; Economics; Health benefit programs; Laws; Managed care systems; Pharmaceutical services; Prescriptions; Reimbursement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COURT; HUMAN; MANAGED CARE; MEDICAID; PHARMACY; PRESCRIPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

EID: 0035890308     PISSN: 10792082     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/58.22.2147     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Kassirer JP. Doctor discontent. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339:1543-5.
2. Simon SR, Pan RJD, Sullivan AM et al. Views of managed care: a survey of students, residents, faculty, and deans at medical schools in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340:928-36.
3. Ruane TJ. Doctor discontent. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340:651.
4. Dubler NN. Mediation and managed care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998; 46:359-64.