|
Volumn 20, Issue 9-10, 2001, Pages 1461-1467
|
What can go wrong when you assume that correlated data are independent: An illustration from the evaluation of a childhood health intervention in Brazil
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
BRAZIL;
CHILD;
CHILD HEALTH;
CHILD HEALTH CARE;
CHILD NUTRITION;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CORRELATION FUNCTION;
DATA ANALYSIS;
DAY CARE;
DIARRHEA;
FOLLOW UP;
HUMAN;
LONGITUDINAL STUDY;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALNUTRITION;
MEDICINE;
NUTRITIONAL STATUS;
OBSERVATION;
PARAMETER;
PUBLIC HEALTH;
REGRESSION ANALYSIS;
RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION;
RISK;
SKIN INFECTION;
VARIANCE;
WASTING SYNDROME;
AGE FACTORS;
BRAZIL;
CHILD DAY CARE CENTERS;
CHILD, PRESCHOOL;
HUMANS;
INFANT;
LOGISTIC MODELS;
LONGITUDINAL STUDIES;
MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;
NUTRITION ASSESSMENT;
ODDS RATIO;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);
TIME FACTORS;
WASTING SYNDROME;
|
EID: 0035873793
PISSN: 02776715
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1002/sim.682 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (42)
|
References (11)
|