|
Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 661-684
|
Competing risks analysis of patients with osteosarcoma: A comparison of four different approaches
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;
BLEOMYCIN;
CISPLATIN;
CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE;
DACTINOMYCIN;
DOXORUBICIN;
METHOTREXATE;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
CANCER;
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY;
CANCER SURGERY;
CAUSE OF DEATH;
CHRONIC DISEASE;
CLINICAL RESEARCH;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DATA ANALYSIS;
DRUG MEGADOSE;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INCIDENCE;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
MULTICENTER STUDY;
NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL;
OSTEOSARCOMA;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
REGRESSION ANALYSIS;
RISK;
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
TIME;
TREATMENT FAILURE;
ADOLESCENT;
ANTINEOPLASTIC COMBINED CHEMOTHERAPY PROTOCOLS;
BLEOMYCIN;
BONE NEOPLASMS;
CISPLATIN;
CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE;
DACTINOMYCIN;
DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL;
DOXORUBICIN;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
LUNG NEOPLASMS;
MALE;
METHOTREXATE;
NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL;
OSTEOSARCOMA;
PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
|
EID: 0035869681
PISSN: 02776715
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1002/sim.711 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (106)
|
References (30)
|