Consent: The patients' view - A summary of findings from a study of patients' perceptions of their consent to dental care

British Dental Journal

Volumn 191, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 36-40

  King, J ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DENTAL CARE; DENTISTRY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; DOCUMENTATION; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVIEW; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED KINGDOM;

EMPIRICAL APPROACH; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

DENTAL CARE; DENTIST-PATIENT RELATIONS; DOCUMENTATION; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVIEWS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; STATE DENTISTRY;

EID: 0035859648     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801086a     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Doyle C. Question marks over consent. Daily Telegraph Feb 22, 2000.
2. Grubb A. In the preface to vol 50 Butterworth Medical Legal Reports Butterworths, 1999.
3. Brazier M. Medicine patients and the law. London: Penguin, 1993, p80-81.
4. Faden R, Beauchamp T. A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
5. General Medical Council. Duties of a doctor - seeking patients' consent www.gmc-uk.org
6. General Dental Council Maintaining Standards, 1997.
7. King J, Hillier S, Doyal L. Consent in dental care. London: Kings Fund, 2000.
8. King J. Confusion about consent in Dental Profile. Dental Practice Board, May 2000 p 6-7
9. The National Health Service (General Dental Services) Regulations 1992 p2414-2415.
10. Pope C, Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health care research. Br Med J 1995; 313: 42-45.
11. Ozar D, Sokol D. Dental ethics at chairside. London: Mosby, 1994 p38-50.