Aryl ketone photochemistry on monolayer protected clusters: Study of the Norrish type II reaction as a probe of conformational mobility and for selective surface modification

Langmuir

Volumn 17, Issue 23, 2001, Pages 7355-7363

  Kell, Arnold J ^a   Workentin, Mark S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERSYSTEM CROSSING (ISC);

ALCOHOLS; BENZENE; CONFORMATIONS; KETONES; MONOLAYERS;

PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTIONS;

EID: 0035856646     PISSN: 07437463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/la015505x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Wagner, P.J. Acc. Chem. Res. 1971, 4, 168.
2. Wagner, P.J. CRC HandboOk of Photochemistry and Photobiology; CRC Press, Inc.: Boca Raton, FL, 1995; Chapter 38.
3. Caldwell, R.A.; Dhawan, S.N.; Majima, T.J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 6454.
4. Ramamurthy, V.; Corbon, D.R.; Johnston, L.J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 3870.
5. Ramamurthy, V.; Corbin, D.R.; Eaton, D.F. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 5269.
6. Corbin, D.R.; Eaton, D.F.; Ramamurthy, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 4848.
7. Brett, T.J.; Stezowski, J.J. Chem. Commun. 2000, 857.
8. Rao, B.N.; Syamala, M.S.; Turro, N.J.; Ramamurthy, V. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 5517.
9. Reddy, G.D.; Ramamurthy, V. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 5521.
10. Baldvins, J.E.; Cui, C.; Weiss, R.G. Photochem. Photobiol. 1996, 63, 726.
11. He, Z.; Weiss, R.G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 5535.
12. Workentin, M.S.; Leigh, W.J.; Jeffrey, K.R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7329.
13. Winkle, J.R.; Worsham, P.R.; Schanze, K.S.; Whitten, D.G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 103, 3951.
14. Takagi, K.; Harata, E.; Schichi, T.; Kanoh, T.; Sawaki, Y.J. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 1997, 105, 47.
15. Ihmels, H.; Scheffer, J.R. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 885.
16. Ulman, A. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 1533.
17. Rozsnyai, L.F.; Wrighton, M.S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 5993.
18. Wollman, E.W.; Kang, D.; Frisbie, C.D.; Lorkovic, I.M.; Wrighton, M.S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4395.
19. Jocys, G.J.; Workentin, M.S. Chem. Commun. 1999, 839.
20. Pitters, J.L.; Kovar, M.; Griffiths, K.; Norton, P.R.; Workentin, M.S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2144.
21. Wolf, M.; Fox, M.A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 1845.
22. Willner, I.; Doron, A.; Katz, E. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1998, 11, 546.
23. Wolf, M.O.; Fox, M.A. Langmuir 1996, 12, 955.
24. Kim, T.; Chan, K.C.; Crooks, R.M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 189.
25. Fox, M.A.; Wooten, M.D. Langmuir 1997, 13, 7099.
26. Li, W.; Lynch, V.; Thompson, H.; Fox, M.A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7211.
27. Prucker, O.; Naumann, C.A.; Rühe, J.; Knoll, W.; Frank, C.W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8766.
28. We adopt Murray and co-workers MPC nomenclature to describe these organic monolayer gold colloids.
29. Zhang, J.; Whitesell, J.K.; Fox, M.A. Chem. Mater. 2001, 13, 2323.
30. Hu, J.; Zhang, J.; Liu, F.; Kittredge, K.; Whitesell, J.K.; Fox, M.A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1464.
31. Aguila, A.; Murray, R.W. Langmuir 2000, 16, 5949.
32. Imahori, H.; Arimura, M.; Hanada, T.; Nishimura, Y.; Yamazaki, I.; Sakata, Y.; Fukuzumi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 335.
33. Chechik, V.; Crooks, R.M.; Stirling, C.J.M. Adv. Mater. 2000, 12, 1161.
34. Templeton, A.C.; Wuelfing, W.P.; Murray, R.W. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 26.
35. Kell, A.J.; Stringle, D.S.; Workentin, M.S. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3381.
36. Hostetler, M.J.; Wingate, J.E.; Zhong, C.-J.; Harris, J.E.; Vachet, R.W.; Clark, M.R.; Londono, J.D.; Green, S.J.; Stokes, J.J.; Wignall, G.D.; Glish, G.L.; Porter, M.D.; Evans, N.D.; Murray, R.W. Langmiur 1998, 14, 17.
37. Brust, M.; Walker, M.; Bethell, D.; Schiffrin, D.J.; Whyman, R. J. Chem. Commun. 1994, 801.
38. Hostetler, M.J.; Templeton, A.C.; Murray, R.W. Langmuir 1999, 15, 3782.
39. Templeton, A.C.; Hostetler, M.J.; Kraft, C.T.; Murray, R.W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1906.
40. 17SH) and the terminal methyl groups on the exchanging ligand (Scheme 2) and both will contribute to the value for the integration of the methyl resonance (0.88 ppm). (Note: In some cases, the terminal methyl group on the photoactive ligand had a slightly different chemical shift than the base ligand, but nonetheless, the entire triplet was integrated in order to determine the stoichiometry.) Here, it is necessary to subtract the integrated value for the three protons associated with the terminal methyl group on 2, 3, 4, or 5 from the total value for the integration of the triplet at 0.88 ppm. When this is done, we account for the integration for the terminal methyl group on the exchanging ligand and what remains is the integration for the methyl group from the original hexanethiolate, dodecanethiolate, or octadecanethiolate ligand. When this is known, the stoichiometry of the exchanged colloid can be determined.
41. Terrill, R.H.; Postlethwaite, T.A.; Chen, C.-h.; Poon, C.-D.; Terzis, A.; Chen, A.; Hutchison, J.E.; Clark, M.R.; Wignall, G.; Londono, J.D.; Superfine, R.; Falvo, M.; Johnson, C.S.J.; Samulski, E.T.; Murray, R.W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 12537.
42. Badia, A.; Goa, W.; Singh, S.; Demers, L.; Cicca, L.; Reven, L. Langmuir 1996, 12, 1262.
43. Turro, N.J. Modern Molecular Photochemistry; The Benjamin/ Cummings Publishing Co., Inc: Menlo Park, CA, 1978.
44. Ariel, S.; Ramamurthy, V.; Scheffer, J.R.; Trotter, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 6959.
45. Zimmermann, R.G.; Liu, J.H.; Weiss, R.G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 5264.
46. The number of defect sites was calculated by assuming that all of surface atoms at either the edge or the vertice and those directly adjacent to the edge or vertice can bind a probe substrate.