Vacuum assisted core breast biopsy under digital stereotactic control;Vakuumstanzbiopsie der brust unter digitaler stereotaxie - Erste erfahrungen mit dem mammotome in Baden

Praxis

Volumn 90, Issue 37, 2001, Pages 1582-1586

  Wetter, D ^a   Otto, R ^a  

^a Cantonal Hospital Baden   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Breast; Digital stereotaxy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; CALCINOSIS; FEMALE; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY;

BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; FEMALE; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;

EID: 0035855995     PISSN: 16618157     EISSN: 16618165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Reston. VA: American College of Radiology, 1993.
2. Kopans DB. Standardized mammography reporting. Radiol Clin North Am 1992; 30: 257-264.
3. D'Orsi CJ, Kopans DB. Mammographic feature analysis. Semin Roentgenol 1993; 28: 204-230. (Pubitemid 23225428)
4. Madjar H, Rickard M, Jellins J, Otto R. IBUS guidlines for the ultrasonic examination of the breast. IBUS International Faculty. International Breast Ultrasound School. Eur J Ultrasound 1999; 9(1): 99-102.
5. Stavros AT, Thickman D et al. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995; 196(1): 123-34.
6. Bassett LW, Kimme-Smith C. Breast sonography. American Journal of Roentgenology, 1991; 156: 449-455.
7. Thibault F, Meunier M et al. Diagnostic accuracy of sonography and combined sonographic assessment and sonographically guided cytology in nonpalpable solid breast lesions. J Clin Ultrasound 2000; 28(8): 387 98.
8. Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. A retrospective review. Cancer 1995; 76(4): 626-30.
9. Gundry K, Berg W. Treatment issues and core needle breast biopsy: Clinical context. AJR 1998; 171: 41-9. (Pubitemid 28308646)
10. Lee CH, Egglin TK et al. Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic core needle biopsy: analysis by means of mammographic findings. Radiology 1997; 202: 849-854. (Pubitemid 27093465)
11. Liberman L, Dershaw DD et al. Stereotaxic core biopsy of impalpable spiculated breast masses. AJR 1995; 165: 551-4.
12. Liberman L, Dershaw DD et al. Stereotaxic 14-Gauge breast biopsy: how many core biopsy specimens are needed? Radiology 1994; 192: 793-5.
13. Rubin E, Dempsey PJ et al. Needle-Localization biopsy of the breast: impact of a selective core needle biopsy program on yield. Radiology 1995; 195: 627-31.
14. Khanna AK, Singh MR et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology, imprint cytology and tru-cut needle biopsy in breast lumps: a comparative evaluation. J Indian Med Assoc 1991; 89(7): 192-5.
15. Jackson VP, Bassett LW. Stereotactic fine-needle aspiration biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions. AJR 1990; 154: 1196-7.
16. Masood S. Occult breast lesions and aspiration biopsy: a new challenge (editorial). Diagn Cytopathol 1993; 9: 613-4.
17. Zannis VJ, Alinao KM. The evolving practice pattern of the breast surgeon with disappearance of open biopsy for nonpalpable lesions. Am J Surg 1998; 176(6): 525-8.
18. Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Schaumlöffel U. et al. Minimally invasive stereotaxic vacuum core breast biopsy. Eur Radiol 1998; 8(3): 377-85. (Pubitemid 128546241)
19. Schonhofen H, Arnold, Hess T, Allgayer B. Digital mammography: experiances in ist clinical application. Rofo 1998; 169(1): 45-52.
20. Perlet C, Becker C et al. A comparison of digital luminescence mammography and conventional film - screen system: prelinimary results of clinical evaluation. Eur J Med Res 1998; 3(3): 165-71.
21. Burbank F, Parker SH, Fogarty TJ. Stereotactic breast biopsy: improved tissue harvesting with the Mammotome. Ann Surg 1996; 62(9): 738-44. (Pubitemid 26309056)