Adverse events regional feasibility study: Methodological results

New Zealand Medical Journal

Volumn 114, Issue 1131, 2001, Pages 200-202

  Davis, Peter ^a   Lay Yee, Roy ^b   Schug, Stephan ^c   Briant, Robin ^b   Scott, Alastair ^b   Johnson, Sandra ^b   Bingley, Wendy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; DRUG THERAPY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; NEW ZEALAND; PUBLIC HOSPITAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ALGORITHMS; BENCHMARKING; DRUG THERAPY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HOSPITALS, PUBLIC; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS; NEW ZEALAND; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0035844179     PISSN: 00288446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Smidt NA, McQueen EG. Adverse reactions to drugs: a comprehensive hospital inpatient survey. NZ Med J 1972; 76: 397-401.
2. Pettigrew RA, McDonald JR, van Rij AM. Developing a system for surgical audit. Aust NZ J Surg 1991; 61: 563-9.
3. Merry AF, Peck DJ. Anaesthetists, errors in drug administration and the law. NZ Med J 1995, 108: 185-7.
4. Ministry of Health, 1995, Purchasing for Your Health 1994/95. Wellington; 1995.
5. Ministry of Health. Taking care II. Wellington; 1997.
6. Harvard Medical Practice Study. 1990, Patients, doctors and lawyers: medical injury, malpractice litigation, and patient compensation in New York. New York: Harvard College; 1990.
7. Harvey R, Goss J. Report on the feasibility study of an Australian hospitals' adverse health care incidents study. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Department of Health, Housing and Community Services; 1992.
8. Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW et al. The quality in Australian health care study. Med J Aust 1995; 163: 458-71.
9. Localio AR, Weaver SL, Landis JR et al. Identifying adverse events caused by medical care: Degree of physician agreement in a retrospective chart review. Ann Intern Med 1996; 125: 456-64.
10. Goldman RL. The reliability of peer assessments of quality of care. JAMA 1992; 267: 958-60.
11. Hofer TP, Bernstein SJ, DeMonner S, Hayward RA. Discussion between reviewers does not improve reliability of peer review of hospital quality. Med Care 2000; 38: 152-61.
12. Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin JR et al. Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med Care 2000; 18: 261-71.