|
Volumn 358, Issue 9293, 2001, Pages 1648-
|
Is clinical research still too haphazard? [9] (multiple letters)
b
NONE
(United Kingdom)
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
BRONCHOCONSTRICTING AGENT;
HEXAMETHONIUM;
HEXAMETHONIUM BROMIDE;
NICOTINIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT;
AUTOPSY;
BRONCHODILATATION;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
CLINICAL RESEARCH;
DYSPNEA;
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION;
HUMAN;
HYPERTENSION;
HYPOTENSION;
LETTER;
LUNG COMPLICATION;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
MEDICAL INFORMATION;
MULTIPLE ORGAN FAILURE;
PATIENT CARE;
PATIENT RIGHT;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;
MEDICAL RESEARCH;
METHODOLOGY;
NOTE;
RESEARCH;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH;
CLINICAL TRIALS;
HEXAMETHONIUM;
HUMANS;
INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL;
NICOTINIC ANTAGONISTS;
NONTHERAPEUTIC HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
RESEARCH;
|
EID: 0035841630
PISSN: 01406736
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06686-7 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (12)
|
References (5)
|