The CO/Pt(111) Puzzle a

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 105, Issue 18, 2001, Pages 4018-4025

  Feibelman, Peter J ^a,c   Hammer, B ^b,d   Norskov, J K ^c,g   Wagner, F ^d,h   Scheffler, M ^a   Stump, R ^e   Watwe, R ^f   Dumesic, J ^b  

^a SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^d FRITZ HABER INSTITUT DER MAX PLANCK GESELLSCHAFT   (Germany)

^e Wisconsin Electric Machines and Power Electronics Consortium   (United States)

^f SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

^g MOTOROLA INC   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; GENERALIZED-GRADIENT EXCHANGE-CORRELATION POTENTIAL; LOCAL DENSITY APPROXIMATION;

ADSORPTION; APPROXIMATION THEORY; BINDING ENERGY; CALCULATIONS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRON ENERGY LEVELS; PLATINUM; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; SURFACE CHEMISTRY;

CARBON MONOXIDE;

EID: 0035837035     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp002302t     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. See, e.g.: Kurth, S.; Perdew, J. P.; Blaha, P. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1999, 75, 889.
2. Matveev, A.; Staufer, M.; Mayer, M.; Rosch, N. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1999, 75, 863.
3. Adamson, R. D.; Gill, P. M. W.; Pople, J. A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 284, 6.
4. Gill, P. M. W. Mol. Phys. 1996, 89, 433.
5. Johnson, B. G.; Gill, P. M. W.; Pople, J. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5612.
6. Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. Phys. Rev. 1964, 136, B864.
7. Perdew, J. P. In Electronic Structure of Solids '91; Ziesche, P., Eschrig, H., Eds.; Akademie Verlag: Berlin, 1991. Perdew, J. P.; Wang, Y. Unpublished.
8. Hammer, B.; Hansen, L.; Norskov, J. K. Phys. Rev. 1999, B59, 7413.
9. Scheffler, M.; Stampfl, C. In Handbook of Surface Science, v.2: Electronic Structure; Horn, K., Scheffler, M., Eds.; Eisevier Science: Amsterdam, 2000; pp 285-366.
10. Mitas, L.; Grossman, J. C.; Stich, L; Tobik, J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 1479.
11. Grossman, J. C.; Mitas, L.; Ragavachari, K. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995, 75, 3870.
12. (a) Gross, A. Surf. Sei. Rep. 1998, 32, 291.
13. (b) Alavi, A.; Hu, P.; Deutsch, T.; Silvestrelli, P. L.; Hutter, J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 80, 3650.
14. Ogletree, D. F.; Van Hove, M. A.; Somorjai, G. A. Surf. Sei. 1986, 173, 351.
15. Blackman, G. S.; et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1988, 61, 2352.
16. Hopster, H.; Ibach, H. Surf. Sei. 1978, 77, 109.
17. Steininger, H.; Lehwald, S.; Ibach, H. Surf. Sei. 1982, 123, 264.
18. Hayden, B.; Kretschmar, K.; Bradshaw, A. M.; Greenler, R. G. Surf. Sei. 1985, 149, 394.
19. Luo, J. S.; Tobin, R. G.; Lambert, D. K.; Fisher, G. B.; Dimaggio, C. L. Surf. Sei. 1992, 274, 53.
20. Xu, J. Z.; Yates, J. T., Jr. Surf. Sei. 1995, 327, 193.
21. Henderson, M. A.; Szabó, A.; Yates, J. T., Jr. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 91, 7245.
22. Bocquet, M.-L.; Sautet, Ph.Surf. Sei. 1996, 560, 128.
23. Stroscio, J. A.; Eigler, D. M. Science 1991, 254, 1319.
24. Pedersen, M. O.; Bocquet, M. L.; Sautet, P.; Laegsgaard, E.; Stensgaard, I.; Besenbacher, F. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 299, 403.
25. Gambardella, P. Private communication.
26. Kohn, W.; Sham, L. J. Phys.-Rev. 1965, 140, A1133.
27. Philipsen, P. H. T.; van Lenthe, E.; Snijders, J. G.; Baerends, E. J. Phys. Rev. 1997, B56, 13556.
28. Hammer, B.; Morikawa, Y.; Noørskov, J. K. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 76, 2141.
29. Jenhison, D. R.; Schultz, P. A.; Sears, M. P. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 4828.
30. Curulla, D.; Clotet, A.; Ricart, J. M.; Illas, F. J. Phys.Chem. 1999, BI03, 5246.
31. Ohnishi, S.; Watari, N. Phys. Rev. 1994, B49, 14619.
32. Ohnishi, S.; Watari, N. Phys. Rev. 1994, B49, 14619.
33. Hammer, B.; Nielsen, O. H.; Nprskov, J. K. Catal. Lett. 1997, 46, 31.
34. Schweizer, E.; Persson, B. N. J.; Tushaus, M.; Hoge, D.; Bradshaw, A. M. Surf. Sei. 1989, 213, 49.
35. Lynch, M.; Hu, P. Surf. Sei. 2000,458,1. However, several unusual site-preference energies reported in this article suggest poor convergence of the results and, more specifically, that it is insufficient to employ only a 2 × 2 surface brillouin zone sample with a primitive p(2 × 2) cell and a three-layer Pt(111) slab. For example. Lynch and Hu predict a surprisingly strong preference, 0.09 eV, for p(2 × 2)-CO/Pt(111) binding at the hep site rather than the fee and a surprisingly small binding energy difference, namely zero, between the fee site and the bridge. With the same parameters, VASP-USP calculations (see section IVA) yield a 0.08 eV preference for the hep over the fee site, similar to Lynch and Hu's result. But the same method instead predicts a 0.01 eV preference for the fee hollow when one uses a larger (rectangular, 2 × 2√3) supercell and a finer, 6 × 4 SBZ sample, adsorbing the CO's on a 6-layer slab. [Well-converged VASP-USP calculations also predict a 0.01 eV fee preference for c(4 × 2)-CO/ Pt(111).] Regarding the fee vs bridge preference, Dacapo results (see section IVB) for the p(2 × 2) structure favor the fee site by 0.04 eV. For 1/3 ML CO, FP-LAPW energies (see section IVC) for the √3 × V3-R30° structure imply preferences of 0.01 and 0.03 eV for the fee hollow relative to the hep and bridge sites. Thus there is little room for doubt concerning the signs and magnitudes of CO's site preferences on Pt(111), within the GGA.
36. Kresse, G.; Hafner, J. Phys. Rev. 1993, B47,558;
37. 1994, B49,14251.
38. Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Comput. Mater. Sei. 1996, 6, 15.
39. Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Phys. Rev. 1996, B54, 11169.
40. Vanderbilt, D. Phys. Rev. 1990, B41, 7892.
41. Pasquarello, A.; et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992,69,1982.
42. Laasonen, K.; et al. Phys. Rev. 1993, B47, 10142.
43. Kresse, G.; Hafner, J. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1994, 6, 8245.
44. Blöchl, P. E. Phys. Rev. 1994, B50, 17953.
45. Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. Phys. Rev. 1999, B59, 1758.
46. Ceperley, D. M.; Aider, B. J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1980, 45, 566. As parametrized by:
47. Perdew, J.; Zunger, A. Phys. Rev. 1981, B23, 5048.
48. Methfessel, M.; Paxton, A. T. Phys. Rev. 1989, B40, 3616.
49. Perdew, J. P.; Chevary. J. A.; Vosko, S. H.; Jackson, K. A.; Pederson, M. R.; Singh, D. J.; Fiolhais, C. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 46, 6671.
50. Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865;
51. 1997, 78,1396.
52. Zhang, Y.; Yang, W. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998,80, 890.
53. Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 80, 891.
54. Blaha, P.; Schwarz, K.; Luitz, J. WIEN97, A Full Potential Linearized Augmented Plane Wave Package for Calculating Crystal Properties; Technol. Universität Wien: Wien, Austria, 1999. 1999 ISBN 3-9501031-0-4. This is the updated version of the following: Blaha, P.;
55. Schwarz, K.; Sorantin, P.; Trickey, S. B. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1990, 59, 299 (http://www.tuwien.ac.ai/theochem/wien97/).
56. Kohler, B.; Wilke, S.; Scheffler, M.; Kouba, R.; Ambrosch-Draxl, C. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1996, 94, 331
57. Petersen, M.; Wagner, F.; Hufnagel, L.; Scheffler, M.; Blaha, P.; Schwarz, K. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2000, 726, 294.
58. Dohmen, R.; Pichlmeier, J.; Petersen, M.; Wagner, F.; Scheffler, M. A parallel implementation of the FP-LAPW method for distributedmemory machines. Comput. Sei. Eng., in press.
59. Singh, D. J. Planewaves, Pseudopotentials and the lAP\V-Method; Kluwer Academic: Boston, MA, 1994.
60. Neugebauer, J.; Scheffler, M. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 46, 16067.
61. Wagner, F.; Laloyaux, Th.; Scheffler, M. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 57, 2102.
62. Grossmann, A.; Erley, W.; Ibach, H. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993, 71, 2078;
63. Appl. Phys. 1993, A57, 499.
64. Lahtinen, J.; Vaari, J.; Kauraala, K.; Soares, E. A.; Van Hove, M. A. Surf. Sei. 2000, 448, 269.
65. Kevan, S. D.; et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1981, 46, 1629.
66. Held, G.; Schuler, J.; Sklarek, W.; Steinrück, H. P. Surf. Sei. 1998, 398, 154.
67. Davis, R.; Woodruff, D. P.; Hofmann, P.; Schaff, O.; Fernandez, V.; Schindler, K. M.; Fritzsche, V.; Bradshaw, A. M. J. Phys.: Contiens. Matter 1996, 8, 1367.
68. Mapledoram, L. D.; Bessent, M. P.; Wander, A.; King, D. A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994, 228, 527.
69. Davila, M. E.; et al. Surf. Sei. 1994, 311, 337.
70. Spninger, P. T.; Besenbacher, F.; Stensgaard, I. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 243, 439.
71. Moler, E. J.; Kellar, S. A.; Huff, W. R. A.; Hussain, Z.; Chen, Y.; Shirley, D. A. Phys. Rev. 1996, B54, 10862. For vibration spectroscopic results, see references therein.
72. Lopez, N.; Nprskov, J. K. To be published.
73. Michalk, G.; Moritz, W.; Pfnur, H.; Menzel, D. Surf. Sei. 1983, 729, 92.
74. Over, H.; Moritz, W.; Ertl, G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993, 70, 315.
75. Piercy, P.; Heimann, P. A.; Michalk, G.; Menzel, D. Surf. Sei. 1989, 2/9, 189.
76. Mortensen, J. J.; Morikawa, Y.; Hammer, B.; Norskov, J. K. Z. Phys. Chem. 1997,198, 113.
77. Mavrikakis, M.; Hammer, B.; Nørskov, J. K. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998,81,2819.
78. Stampfl, C; Scheffler, M. To be published.
79. Koestner, R. J.; Van Hove, M. A.; Somorjai, G. A. Surf. Sei. 1981, 107, 439.
80. Mavrikakis, M.; Norskov, J. K. To be published.
81. Ohtani, H.; Van Hove, M. A.; Somorjai, G. A. Surf. Sei. 1987, 187, 372.
82. Giessel, T.; et al. Surf. Sei. 1998, 406, 90.
83. Sautet, P.; Rose, M. K.; Dunphy, J. C.; Behler, S.; Salmeron, M. Surf. Sei. 2000, 453, 25.
84. Schwarz, E. W. Thesis, Osnabrück, 1983.