Comparaciones abstrusas en los resúmenes de ensayos clínicos en revistas médicas españolas

Medicina Clinica

Volumn 117, Issue 19, 2001, Pages 732-733

  Librero, Julián ^a   Peiró, Salvador ^b  

^a Fund Inst de Invest Serv Salud   (Spain)

^b Generalitat Valenciana   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bias; Clinical trials; Data interpretation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; PUBLISHING; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; SPAIN;

CLINICAL TRIALS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENGLISH ABSTRACT; HUMAN; PUBLISHING; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T;

EID: 0035830087     PISSN: 00257753     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0025-7753(01)72240-3     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Indexes and boundaries for «quantitative significance» in statistical decisions
2. Indexes of contrast and quantitative significance for comparisons of two groups
3. Abstruse comparisons: The problems of numerical contrasts of two groups
4. An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment
5. Measured enthusiam: Does the method of reporting trial results alter perceptions of therapeutic effectiveness?
6. Influencia de la presentación de los resultados de los ensayos clínicos en la intención de prescribir: Relativizando el riesgo relativo
7. The number needed to treat: A clinically useful measure of treatment effect
8. Down with odds ratios!
9. La calidad de la informacion clínica (y III): ¿Estadísticamente significativo o clínicamente importante?
10. The need for concrete improvement in abstract qualify